Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

High percentage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides in The Netherlands

  • Arjanne Van Griethuysen*
  • , Annemarie Van't Veen
  • , Anton Buiting
  • , Timothy Walsh
  • , Jan Kluytmans
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While testing the in vitro activities of 14 antimicrobial agents against 107 methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and 250 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates collected in The Netherlands, we found to our surprise that 19 (7.6%) MRSA isolates were suspected of having reduced susceptibilities to the glycopeptides when the Etest system (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) was used with a large inoculum (no. 2 McFarland standard) and an extended incubation time (48 h) on brain heart infusion agar for MIC testing. Eventually, 15 of these isolates were classified as heterogeneously resistant to glycopeptides (heterogeneously glycopeptide-intermediate S. aureus [hGISA] isolates) according to the population analysis profile-area under the curve analysis. The MICs at which 50 and 90% of isolates are inhibited obtained with the Etest system with the large inoculum were as follows: for MSSA isolates, 3.0 and 4.0 μg/ml, respectively, for both teicoplanin and vancomycin; for MRSA isolates, 3.0 and 8.0 μg/ml, respectively, for teicoplanin, and 3.0 and 4.0 μg/ml, respectively, for vancomycin. This is the first report of hGISA isolates in The Netherlands.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2487-2491
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Clinical Microbiology
Volume41
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'High percentage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides in The Netherlands'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this