TY - JOUR
T1 - High-Grade Glioma Treatment Response Monitoring Biomarkers (2)
T2 - A Position Statement on the Evidence Supporting the Use of Advanced MRI Techniques in the Clinic, and the Latest Bench-to-Bedside Developments. Part 2: Spectroscopy, Chemical Exchange Saturation, Multiparametric Imaging, and Radiomics
AU - Booth, Thomas C.
AU - Wiegers, Evita C.
AU - Warnert, Esther A.H.
AU - Schmainda, Kathleen M.
AU - Riemer, Frank
AU - Nechifor, Ruben E.
AU - Keil, Vera C.
AU - Hangel, Gilbert
AU - Figueiredo, Patrícia
AU - Álvarez-Torres, Maria Del Mar
AU - Henriksen, Otto M.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Melissa Prah for assistance with obtaining figures, and Andrei Roman and Lydia Washechek for help with manuscript preparation. We also thank the national representatives who helped complete the national guideline survey (names listed in the Supplementary Material).
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Booth, Wiegers, Warnert, Schmainda, Riemer, Nechifor, Keil, Hangel, Figueiredo, Álvarez-Torres and Henriksen.
Copyright © 2022 Booth, Wiegers, Warnert, Schmainda, Riemer, Nechifor, Keil, Hangel, Figueiredo, Álvarez-Torres and Henriksen.
PY - 2022/2/28
Y1 - 2022/2/28
N2 - Objective: To summarize evidence for use of advanced MRI techniques as monitoring biomarkers in the clinic, and to highlight the latest bench-to-bedside developments. Methods: The current evidence regarding the potential for monitoring biomarkers was reviewed and individual modalities of metabolism and/or chemical composition imaging discussed. Perfusion, permeability, and microstructure imaging were similarly analyzed in Part 1 of this two-part review article and are valuable reading as background to this article. We appraise the clinic readiness of all the individual modalities and consider methodologies involving machine learning (radiomics) and the combination of MRI approaches (multiparametric imaging). Results: The biochemical composition of high-grade gliomas is markedly different from healthy brain tissue. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy allows the simultaneous acquisition of an array of metabolic alterations, with choline-based ratios appearing to be consistently discriminatory in treatment response assessment, although challenges remain despite this being a mature technique. Promising directions relate to ultra-high field strengths, 2-hydroxyglutarate analysis, and the use of non-proton nuclei. Labile protons on endogenous proteins can be selectively targeted with chemical exchange saturation transfer to give high resolution images. The body of evidence for clinical application of amide proton transfer imaging has been building for a decade, but more evidence is required to confirm chemical exchange saturation transfer use as a monitoring biomarker. Multiparametric methodologies, including the incorporation of nuclear medicine techniques, combine probes measuring different tumor properties. Although potentially synergistic, the limitations of each individual modality also can be compounded, particularly in the absence of standardization. Machine learning requires large datasets with high-quality annotation; there is currently low-level evidence for monitoring biomarker clinical application. Conclusion: Advanced MRI techniques show huge promise in treatment response assessment. The clinical readiness analysis highlights that most monitoring biomarkers require standardized international consensus guidelines, with more facilitation regarding technique implementation and reporting in the clinic.
AB - Objective: To summarize evidence for use of advanced MRI techniques as monitoring biomarkers in the clinic, and to highlight the latest bench-to-bedside developments. Methods: The current evidence regarding the potential for monitoring biomarkers was reviewed and individual modalities of metabolism and/or chemical composition imaging discussed. Perfusion, permeability, and microstructure imaging were similarly analyzed in Part 1 of this two-part review article and are valuable reading as background to this article. We appraise the clinic readiness of all the individual modalities and consider methodologies involving machine learning (radiomics) and the combination of MRI approaches (multiparametric imaging). Results: The biochemical composition of high-grade gliomas is markedly different from healthy brain tissue. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy allows the simultaneous acquisition of an array of metabolic alterations, with choline-based ratios appearing to be consistently discriminatory in treatment response assessment, although challenges remain despite this being a mature technique. Promising directions relate to ultra-high field strengths, 2-hydroxyglutarate analysis, and the use of non-proton nuclei. Labile protons on endogenous proteins can be selectively targeted with chemical exchange saturation transfer to give high resolution images. The body of evidence for clinical application of amide proton transfer imaging has been building for a decade, but more evidence is required to confirm chemical exchange saturation transfer use as a monitoring biomarker. Multiparametric methodologies, including the incorporation of nuclear medicine techniques, combine probes measuring different tumor properties. Although potentially synergistic, the limitations of each individual modality also can be compounded, particularly in the absence of standardization. Machine learning requires large datasets with high-quality annotation; there is currently low-level evidence for monitoring biomarker clinical application. Conclusion: Advanced MRI techniques show huge promise in treatment response assessment. The clinical readiness analysis highlights that most monitoring biomarkers require standardized international consensus guidelines, with more facilitation regarding technique implementation and reporting in the clinic.
KW - CEST
KW - glioblastoma
KW - high-grade glioma
KW - monitoring biomarker
KW - MRI
KW - radiomics
KW - spectroscopy
KW - treatment response
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85130696453&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fonc.2021.811425
DO - 10.3389/fonc.2021.811425
M3 - Review article
C2 - 35340697
AN - SCOPUS:85130696453
SN - 2234-943X
VL - 11
JO - Frontiers in oncology
JF - Frontiers in oncology
M1 - 811425
ER -