TY - JOUR
T1 - Health literacy and pain neuroscience education in an interdisciplinary pain management programme
T2 - A qualitative study of patient perspectives
AU - Oosterhaven, Janke
AU - Pell, Christopher D.
AU - Schröder, Carin D.
AU - Popma, Hans
AU - Spierenburg, Loes
AU - Devillé, Walter L.J.M.
AU - Wittink, Harriet
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/12/18
Y1 - 2023/12/18
N2 - Introduction:Pain neuroscience education is part of interdisciplinary pain management programs (IPMPs). To date, the role of health literacy on patients' understanding of pain neuroscience education has not sufficiently been examined.Objectives:Drawing on interviews with patients with diverse levels of health literacy, this article explores patient perspectives on pain neuroscience education.Methods:Purposively sampled patients from an IPMP were interviewed twice (waiting list and after 4 weeks). A directed qualitative content analysis was performed with the Integrated Conceptual Model of Health Literacy as an analytic framework.Results:Thirteen patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain were interviewed: 4 men and 9 women aged from 21 to 77 years with diverse educational and mostly low health literacy. One participant dropped out after baseline. Some participants gained access to health information actively; others relied on the expertise of their healthcare providers. Most participants did not seem to receive the information in the pain neuroscience education as intended, experienced difficulties with understanding the message, negatively appraised the information, and were not able to apply this in their daily lives. Health literacy levels likely played a role in this.Conclusions:Pain neuroscience education tailored to patients' health literacy levels, information needs, and learning strategies is needed.
AB - Introduction:Pain neuroscience education is part of interdisciplinary pain management programs (IPMPs). To date, the role of health literacy on patients' understanding of pain neuroscience education has not sufficiently been examined.Objectives:Drawing on interviews with patients with diverse levels of health literacy, this article explores patient perspectives on pain neuroscience education.Methods:Purposively sampled patients from an IPMP were interviewed twice (waiting list and after 4 weeks). A directed qualitative content analysis was performed with the Integrated Conceptual Model of Health Literacy as an analytic framework.Results:Thirteen patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain were interviewed: 4 men and 9 women aged from 21 to 77 years with diverse educational and mostly low health literacy. One participant dropped out after baseline. Some participants gained access to health information actively; others relied on the expertise of their healthcare providers. Most participants did not seem to receive the information in the pain neuroscience education as intended, experienced difficulties with understanding the message, negatively appraised the information, and were not able to apply this in their daily lives. Health literacy levels likely played a role in this.Conclusions:Pain neuroscience education tailored to patients' health literacy levels, information needs, and learning strategies is needed.
KW - Health literacy
KW - Interview
KW - Musculoskeletal pain
KW - Pain management
KW - Patient education
KW - Qualitative research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85178069348&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001093
DO - 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001093
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85178069348
SN - 2471-2531
VL - 8
JO - Pain reports
JF - Pain reports
IS - 6
M1 - E1093
ER -