Harmonizing organ-at-risk structure names using open-source large language models

  • Adrian Thummerer*
  • , Matteo Maspero
  • , Erik van der Bijl
  • , Stefanie Corradini
  • , Claus Belka
  • , Guillaume Landry
  • , Christopher Kurz
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background and purpose: Standardized radiotherapy structure nomenclature is crucial for automation, inter-institutional collaborations, and large-scale deep learning studies in radiation oncology. Despite the availability of nomenclature guidelines (AAPM-TG-263), their implementation is lacking and still faces challenges. This study evaluated open-source large language models (LLMs) for automated organ-at-risk (OAR) renaming on a multi-institutional and multilingual dataset. Materials and methods: Four open-source LLMs (Llama 3.3, Llama 3.3 R1, DeepSeek V3, DeepSeek R1) were evaluated using a dataset of 34,177 OAR structures from 1684 patients collected at three university medical centers with manual TG-263 ground-truth labels. LLM renaming was performed using a few-shot prompting technique, including detailed instructions and generic examples. Performance was assessed by calculating renaming accuracy on the entire dataset and a unique dataset (duplicates removed). In addition, we performed a failure analysis, prompt-based confidence correlation, and Monte Carlo sampling-based uncertainty estimation. Results: High renaming accuracy was achieved, with the reasoning-enhanced DeepSeek R1 model performing best (98.6 % unique accuracy, 99.9 % overall accuracy). Overall, reasoning models outperformed their non-reasoning counterparts. Monte Carlo sampling showed a stronger correlation with prediction errors (correlation coefficient of 0.70 for DeepSeek R1) and better error detection (Sensitivity 0.73, Specificity 1.0 for DeepSeek R1) compared to prompt-based confidence estimation (correlation coefficient < 0.42). Conclusions: Open-source LLMs, particularly those with reasoning capabilities, can accurately harmonize OAR nomenclature according to TG-263 across diverse multilingual and multi-institutional datasets. They can also facilitate TG-263 nomenclature adoption and the creation of large, standardized datasets for research and AI development.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100813
Number of pages7
JournalPhysics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Volume35
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2025

Keywords

  • AAPM TG-263
  • Large language models
  • LLMs
  • Structure renaming

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Harmonizing organ-at-risk structure names using open-source large language models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this