Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Harmonization of slice thickness through resampling improves comparability of MRI-derived neonatal brain volumes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess reliability and agreement of brain volume measurements from neonatal T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans acquired with different slice thickness settings (i.e., 2 mm, 3 mm and 3 mm resampled).

METHODS: We used term-equivalent (38-45 weeks postmenstrual age) T2-weighted MRI scans with slice thicknesses of 2 mm and 3 mm from a subset of 40 preterm and term infants (27-40 weeks' gestation) from two existing neonatal imaging cohorts. Resampling of the 2 mm scans to a 3 mm grid provided a third set of scans, referred to as "3 mm resampled". Automated brain segmentation provided intracranial volume, total brain volume, and volumes for eight brain structures. Reliability and agreement of volume measurements were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots, respectively.

RESULTS: For all volumes, inter-scan reliability was higher for 3 mm vs. 3 mm resampled scans (mean observer ICC >0.92) compared to 2 mm vs. 3 mm scans (mean observer ICC >0.87). Bland-Altman plots revealed smaller mean volume differences between 3 mm and 3 mm resampled scans than between 2 mm and 3 mm scans. However, a proportional bias was found for deep gray matter volume for 3 mm vs. 3 mm resampled scans.

CONCLUSION: Slice thickness influences brain volume measurements from neonatal MRI. Harmonization of imaging data acquired with different settings through image resampling improves reliability and agreement of brain volume measurements.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1868602
JournalFrontiers in radiology
Volume6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Jun 2026

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Harmonization of slice thickness through resampling improves comparability of MRI-derived neonatal brain volumes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this