TY - JOUR
T1 - Haematoma, abscess or meningitis after neuraxial anaesthesia in the USA and the Netherlands
T2 - A closed claims analysis
AU - Bos, Elke M E
AU - Domino, Karen B
AU - de Quelerij, Marcel
AU - Kalkman, Cor J
AU - Hollmann, Markus W
AU - Lirk, Philipp
AU - Posner, Karen L
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 European Society of Anaesthesiology. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/9/1
Y1 - 2020/9/1
N2 - BACKGROUND Severe complications after neuraxial anaesthesia are rare but potentially devastating. OBJECTIVE We aimed to identify characteristics and preventable causes of haematoma, abscess or meningitis after neuraxial anaesthesia. DESIGN Observational study, closed claims analysis. SETTING Closed anaesthesia malpractice claims from the USA and the Netherlands were examined from 2007 until 2017. PATIENTS Claims of patients with haematoma (n ¼ 41), abscess (n = 18) or meningitis (n = 14) associated with neuraxial anaesthesia for labour, acute and chronic pain that initiated and closed between 2007 and 2017 were included. There were no exclusions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES We analysed potential preventable causes in patient-related, neuraxial procedure-related, treatment-related and legal characteristics of these complications. RESULTS Patients experiencing spinal haematoma were predominantly above 60 years of age and using antihaemostatic medication, whereas patients with abscess or meningitis were middle-aged, relatively healthy and more often involved in emergency interventions. Potential preventable causes of unfavourable sequelae constituted errors in timing/ prescription of antihaemostatic medication (10 claims, 14%), unsterile procedures (n = 10, 14%) and delay in diagnosis/ treatment of the complication (n = 18, 25%). The number of claims resulting in payment was similar between countries (USA n = 15, 38% vs. the Netherlands n = 17, 52%; P = 0.25). The median indemnity payment, which the patient received varied widely between the USA (s285 488, n = 14) and the Netherlands (s31 031, n = 17) (P = 0.004). However, the considerable differences in legal systems and administration of expenses between countries may make meaningful comparison of indemnity payments inappropriate. CONCLUSIONS Claims of spinal haematoma were often related to errors in antihaemostatic medication and delay in diagnosis and/or treatment. Spinal abscess claims were related to emergency interventions and lack of sterility. We wish to highlight these potential preventable causes, both when performing the neuraxial procedure and during postprocedural care of patients.
AB - BACKGROUND Severe complications after neuraxial anaesthesia are rare but potentially devastating. OBJECTIVE We aimed to identify characteristics and preventable causes of haematoma, abscess or meningitis after neuraxial anaesthesia. DESIGN Observational study, closed claims analysis. SETTING Closed anaesthesia malpractice claims from the USA and the Netherlands were examined from 2007 until 2017. PATIENTS Claims of patients with haematoma (n ¼ 41), abscess (n = 18) or meningitis (n = 14) associated with neuraxial anaesthesia for labour, acute and chronic pain that initiated and closed between 2007 and 2017 were included. There were no exclusions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES We analysed potential preventable causes in patient-related, neuraxial procedure-related, treatment-related and legal characteristics of these complications. RESULTS Patients experiencing spinal haematoma were predominantly above 60 years of age and using antihaemostatic medication, whereas patients with abscess or meningitis were middle-aged, relatively healthy and more often involved in emergency interventions. Potential preventable causes of unfavourable sequelae constituted errors in timing/ prescription of antihaemostatic medication (10 claims, 14%), unsterile procedures (n = 10, 14%) and delay in diagnosis/ treatment of the complication (n = 18, 25%). The number of claims resulting in payment was similar between countries (USA n = 15, 38% vs. the Netherlands n = 17, 52%; P = 0.25). The median indemnity payment, which the patient received varied widely between the USA (s285 488, n = 14) and the Netherlands (s31 031, n = 17) (P = 0.004). However, the considerable differences in legal systems and administration of expenses between countries may make meaningful comparison of indemnity payments inappropriate. CONCLUSIONS Claims of spinal haematoma were often related to errors in antihaemostatic medication and delay in diagnosis and/or treatment. Spinal abscess claims were related to emergency interventions and lack of sterility. We wish to highlight these potential preventable causes, both when performing the neuraxial procedure and during postprocedural care of patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089302004&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001260
DO - 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001260
M3 - Article
C2 - 32769504
SN - 0265-0215
VL - 37
SP - 743
EP - 751
JO - European Journal of Anaesthesiology
JF - European Journal of Anaesthesiology
IS - 9
ER -