TY - JOUR
T1 - Genomic arrays identify high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia with genomic complexity
T2 - a multi-center study
AU - Leeksma, Alexander C
AU - Baliakas, Panagiotis
AU - Moysiadis, Theodoros
AU - Puiggros, Anna
AU - Plevova, Karla
AU - Van der Kevie-Kersemaekers, Anne-Marie
AU - Posthuma, Hidde
AU - Rodriguez-Vicente, Ana E
AU - Tran, Anh Nhi
AU - Barbany, Gisela
AU - Mansouri, Larry
AU - Gunnarsson, Rebeqa
AU - Parker, Helen
AU - Van den Berg, Eva
AU - Bellido, Mar
AU - Davis, Zadie
AU - Wall, Meaghan
AU - Scarpelli, Ilaria
AU - Österborg, Anders
AU - Hansson, Lotta
AU - Jarosova, Marie
AU - Ghia, Paolo
AU - Poddighe, Pino
AU - Espinet, Blanca
AU - Pospisilova, Sarka
AU - Tam, Constantine
AU - Ysebaert, Loïc
AU - Nguyen-Khac, Florence
AU - Oscier, David
AU - Haferlach, Claudia
AU - Schoumans, Jacqueline
AU - Stevens-Kroef, Marian
AU - Eldering, Eric
AU - Stamatopoulos, Kostas
AU - Rosenquist, Richard
AU - Strefford, Jonathan C
AU - Mellink, Clemens
AU - Kater, Arnon P
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Ferrata Storti Foundation. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/1/1
Y1 - 2021/1/1
N2 - Complex karyotype (CK) identified by chromosome-banding analysis (CBA) has shown prognostic value in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Genomic arrays offer high-resolution genome-wide detection of copy-number alterations (CNAs) and could therefore be well equipped to detect the presence of a CK. Current knowledge on genomic arrays in CLL is based on outcomes of single center studies, in which different cutoffs for CNA calling were used. To further determine the clinical utility of genomic arrays for CNA assessment in CLL diagnostics, we retrospectively analyzed 2293 arrays from 13 diagnostic laboratories according to established standards. CNAs were found outside regions captured by CLL FISH probes in 34% of patients, and several of them including gains of 8q, deletions of 9p and 18p (p<0.01) were linked to poor outcome after correction for multiple testing. Patients (n=972) could be divided in three distinct prognostic subgroups based on the number of CNAs. Only high genomic complexity (high-GC), defined as ≥5 CNAs emerged as an independent adverse prognosticator on multivariable analysis for time to first treatment (Hazard ratio: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.36-3.41; p=0.001) and overall survival (Hazard ratio: 2.54, 95% CI: 1.54-4.17; p<0.001; n=528). Lowering the size cutoff to 1 Mb in 647 patients did not significantly improve risk assessment. Genomic arrays detected more chromosomal abnormalities and performed at least as well in terms of risk stratification compared to simultaneous chromosome banding analysis as determined in 122 patients. Our findings highlight genomic array as an accurate tool for CLL risk stratification.
AB - Complex karyotype (CK) identified by chromosome-banding analysis (CBA) has shown prognostic value in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Genomic arrays offer high-resolution genome-wide detection of copy-number alterations (CNAs) and could therefore be well equipped to detect the presence of a CK. Current knowledge on genomic arrays in CLL is based on outcomes of single center studies, in which different cutoffs for CNA calling were used. To further determine the clinical utility of genomic arrays for CNA assessment in CLL diagnostics, we retrospectively analyzed 2293 arrays from 13 diagnostic laboratories according to established standards. CNAs were found outside regions captured by CLL FISH probes in 34% of patients, and several of them including gains of 8q, deletions of 9p and 18p (p<0.01) were linked to poor outcome after correction for multiple testing. Patients (n=972) could be divided in three distinct prognostic subgroups based on the number of CNAs. Only high genomic complexity (high-GC), defined as ≥5 CNAs emerged as an independent adverse prognosticator on multivariable analysis for time to first treatment (Hazard ratio: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.36-3.41; p=0.001) and overall survival (Hazard ratio: 2.54, 95% CI: 1.54-4.17; p<0.001; n=528). Lowering the size cutoff to 1 Mb in 647 patients did not significantly improve risk assessment. Genomic arrays detected more chromosomal abnormalities and performed at least as well in terms of risk stratification compared to simultaneous chromosome banding analysis as determined in 122 patients. Our findings highlight genomic array as an accurate tool for CLL risk stratification.
KW - Chromosome Aberrations
KW - Genome, Human
KW - Genomics
KW - Humans
KW - Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell/diagnosis
KW - Retrospective Studies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085211294&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3324/HAEMATOL.2019.239947
DO - 10.3324/HAEMATOL.2019.239947
M3 - Article
C2 - 31974198
SN - 0390-6078
VL - 105
SP - 87
EP - 97
JO - Haematologica
JF - Haematologica
IS - 5
ER -