Gene Therapy with Etranacogene Dezaparvovec for Hemophilia B

Steven W Pipe, Frank W G Leebeek, Michael Recht, Nigel S Key, Giancarlo Castaman, Wolfgang Miesbach, Susan Lattimore, Kathelijne Peerlinck, Paul Van der Valk, Michiel Coppens, Peter Kampmann, Karina Meijer, Niamh O'Connell, K John Pasi, Daniel P Hart, Rashid Kazmi, Jan Astermark, Cedric R J R Hermans, Robert Klamroth, Richard LemonsNathan Visweshwar, Annette von Drygalski, Guy Young, Shelley E Crary, Miguel Escobar, Esteban Gomez, Rebecca Kruse-Jarres, Doris V Quon, Emily Symington, Michael Wang, Allison P Wheeler, Robert Gut, Ying P Liu, Ricardo E Dolmetsch, David L Cooper, Yanyan Li, Brahm Goldstein, Paul E Monahan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Moderate-to-severe hemophilia B is treated with lifelong, continuous coagulation factor IX replacement to prevent bleeding. Gene therapy for hemophilia B aims to establish sustained factor IX activity, thereby protecting against bleeding without burdensome factor IX replacement. Methods: In this open-label, phase 3 study, after a lead-in period (≥6 months) of factor IX prophylaxis, we administered one infusion of adeno-associated virus 5 (AAV5) vector expressing the Padua factor IX variant (etranacogene dezaparvovec; 2×1013 genome copies per kilogram of body weight) to 54 men with hemophilia B (factor IX activity ≤2% of the normal value) regardless of preexisting AAV5 neutralizing antibodies. The primary end point was the annualized bleeding rate, evaluated in a noninferiority analysis comparing the rate during months 7 through 18 after etranacogene dezaparvovec treatment with the rate during the lead-in period. Noninferiority of etranacogene dezaparvovec was defined as an upper limit of the two-sided 95% Wald confidence interval of the annualized bleeding rate ratio that was less than the noninferiority margin of 1.8. Superiority, additional efficacy measures, and safety were also assessed. Results: The annualized bleeding rate decreased from 4.19 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.22 to 5.45) during the lead-in period to 1.51 (95% CI, 0.81 to 2.82) during months 7 through 18 after treatment, for a rate ratio of 0.36 (95% Wald CI, 0.20 to 0.64; P<0.001), demonstrating noninferiority and superiority of etranacogene dezaparvovec as compared with factor IX prophylaxis. Factor IX activity had increased from baseline by a least-squares mean of 36.2 percentage points (95% CI, 31.4 to 41.0) at 6 months and 34.3 percentage points (95% CI, 29.5 to 39.1) at 18 months after treatment, and usage of factor IX concentrate decreased by a mean of 248,825 IU per year per participant in the post-treatment period (P<0.001 for all three comparisons). Benefits and safety were observed in participants with predose AAV5 neutralizing antibody titers of less than 700. No treatment-related serious adverse events occurred. Conclusions: Etranacogene dezaparvovec gene therapy was superior to prophylactic factor IX with respect to the annualized bleeding rate, and it had a favorable safety profile.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)706-718
Number of pages13
JournalThe New England journal of medicine
Volume388
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Feb 2023

Keywords

  • Factor IX/genetics
  • Genetic Therapy/methods
  • Genetic Vectors/administration & dosage
  • Hemophilia B/complications
  • Hemorrhage/etiology
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Pediatrics
  • Hematology/Oncology
  • Childhood Diseases
  • Coagulation
  • Genetics General
  • Genetics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gene Therapy with Etranacogene Dezaparvovec for Hemophilia B'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this