Gel instillation sonohysterography (GIS) and saline contrast sonohysterography (SCSH): Comparison of two diagnostic techniques

A. J.M. Bij De Vaate; H. A.M. Brö Lmann; J. W. Van Der Slikke; M. H. Emanuel; J. A.F. Huirne

doi:10.1002/uog.7594

Gel instillation sonohysterography (GIS) and saline contrast sonohysterography (SCSH): Comparison of two diagnostic techniques

A. J.M. Bij De Vaate, H. A.M. Brö Lmann, J. W. Van Der Slikke, M. H. Emanuel, J. A.F. Huirne

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To compare gel instillation sonohysterography (GIS) with saline contrast sonohysterography (SCSH) as diagnostic methods for the evaluation of the uterine cavity. Methods: A prospective cohort study was performed at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, between September 2007 and April 2008. We included 65 women suspected of having an intrauterine abnormality with an indication for SCSH/GIS. First SCSH and subsequently GIS were performed in all women. Distension of the uterine cavity, image quality, visualization of intrauterine abnormalities and pain experienced on a visual analog scale (VAS score) were recorded for both procedures.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	486-489
Number of pages	4
Journal	Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume	35
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.7594
Publication status	Published - 1 Apr 2010

Keywords

Gel instillation sonohysterography
GIS
Intrauterine abnormalities
Saline contrast sonohysterography
SCSH
Ultrasound

Access to Document

10.1002/uog.7594

Cite this

@article{d9fea3acfc2444f6abf92b7f56270394,

title = "Gel instillation sonohysterography (GIS) and saline contrast sonohysterography (SCSH): Comparison of two diagnostic techniques",

abstract = "Objective To compare gel instillation sonohysterography (GIS) with saline contrast sonohysterography (SCSH) as diagnostic methods for the evaluation of the uterine cavity. Methods: A prospective cohort study was performed at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, between September 2007 and April 2008. We included 65 women suspected of having an intrauterine abnormality with an indication for SCSH/GIS. First SCSH and subsequently GIS were performed in all women. Distension of the uterine cavity, image quality, visualization of intrauterine abnormalities and pain experienced on a visual analog scale (VAS score) were recorded for both procedures.",

keywords = "Gel instillation sonohysterography, GIS, Intrauterine abnormalities, Saline contrast sonohysterography, SCSH, Ultrasound",

author = "{Bij De Vaate}, {A. J.M.} and {Br{\"o} Lmann}, {H. A.M.} and {Van Der Slikke}, {J. W.} and Emanuel, {M. H.} and Huirne, {J. A.F.}",

year = "2010",

month = apr,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1002/uog.7594",

language = "English",

volume = "35",

pages = "486--489",

journal = "Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology",

issn = "0960-7692",

publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Inc.",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gel instillation sonohysterography (GIS) and saline contrast sonohysterography (SCSH)

T2 - Comparison of two diagnostic techniques

AU - Bij De Vaate, A. J.M.

AU - Brö Lmann, H. A.M.

AU - Van Der Slikke, J. W.

AU - Emanuel, M. H.

AU - Huirne, J. A.F.

PY - 2010/4/1

Y1 - 2010/4/1

N2 - Objective To compare gel instillation sonohysterography (GIS) with saline contrast sonohysterography (SCSH) as diagnostic methods for the evaluation of the uterine cavity. Methods: A prospective cohort study was performed at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, between September 2007 and April 2008. We included 65 women suspected of having an intrauterine abnormality with an indication for SCSH/GIS. First SCSH and subsequently GIS were performed in all women. Distension of the uterine cavity, image quality, visualization of intrauterine abnormalities and pain experienced on a visual analog scale (VAS score) were recorded for both procedures.

AB - Objective To compare gel instillation sonohysterography (GIS) with saline contrast sonohysterography (SCSH) as diagnostic methods for the evaluation of the uterine cavity. Methods: A prospective cohort study was performed at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, between September 2007 and April 2008. We included 65 women suspected of having an intrauterine abnormality with an indication for SCSH/GIS. First SCSH and subsequently GIS were performed in all women. Distension of the uterine cavity, image quality, visualization of intrauterine abnormalities and pain experienced on a visual analog scale (VAS score) were recorded for both procedures.

KW - Gel instillation sonohysterography

KW - GIS

KW - Intrauterine abnormalities

KW - Saline contrast sonohysterography

KW - SCSH

KW - Ultrasound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951004653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/uog.7594

DO - 10.1002/uog.7594

M3 - Article

C2 - 20178106

AN - SCOPUS:77951004653

SN - 0960-7692

VL - 35

SP - 486

EP - 489

JO - Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

IS - 4

ER -

Gel instillation sonohysterography (GIS) and saline contrast sonohysterography (SCSH): Comparison of two diagnostic techniques

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this