From European Standards to Responsible Use of AI in Clinical Practice

Roosmarie Jessen; Marieke A.R. Bak; Catelijne C.J. Muller; Helena M. Verkooijen; Kak Khee Yeung; M. Corrette Ploem

doi:10.1163/15718093-bja10143

From European Standards to Responsible Use of AI in Clinical Practice

Roosmarie Jessen^*
, Marieke A.R. Bak
, Catelijne C.J. Muller
, Helena M. Verkooijen
, Kak Khee Yeung
, M. Corrette Ploem

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

50 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This contribution explores the implications of the EU legal framework for the use of AI in health care, with a focus on the EU Artificial Intelligence Act. The AI Act, currently the most specific legal AI document, is not tailored to health care and the provisions that focus on the deployer (in this case the physician) lack specificity. Ultimately, we identify five elements for responsible AI usage in medical decision-making that, in our view, should be included in practical guidance, established by the medical profession.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	111-138
Number of pages	28
Journal	European journal of health law
Volume	32
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1163/15718093-bja10143
Publication status	Published - 2025

Keywords

artificial intelligence
Artificial Intelligence Act
legal framework
physician
responsibility

Access to Document

10.1163/15718093-bja10143Licence: CC BY

ejhl-article-p111_1Final published version, 625 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{4de1dc8234474e8d822e66ee2204998c,

title = "From European Standards to Responsible Use of AI in Clinical Practice",

abstract = "This contribution explores the implications of the EU legal framework for the use of AI in health care, with a focus on the EU Artificial Intelligence Act. The AI Act, currently the most specific legal AI document, is not tailored to health care and the provisions that focus on the deployer (in this case the physician) lack specificity. Ultimately, we identify five elements for responsible AI usage in medical decision-making that, in our view, should be included in practical guidance, established by the medical profession.",

keywords = "artificial intelligence, Artificial Intelligence Act, legal framework, physician, responsibility",

author = "Roosmarie Jessen and Bak, \{Marieke A.R.\} and Muller, \{Catelijne C.J.\} and Verkooijen, \{Helena M.\} and Yeung, \{Kak Khee\} and Ploem, \{M. Corrette\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2025 Roosmarie Jessen, 2025. Published with license by Koninklijke Brill BV.",

year = "2025",

doi = "10.1163/15718093-bja10143",

language = "English",

volume = "32",

pages = "111--138",

journal = "European journal of health law",

issn = "0929-0273",

publisher = "Martinus Nijhoff Publishers",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - From European Standards to Responsible Use of AI in Clinical Practice

AU - Jessen, Roosmarie

AU - Bak, Marieke A.R.

AU - Muller, Catelijne C.J.

AU - Verkooijen, Helena M.

AU - Yeung, Kak Khee

AU - Ploem, M. Corrette

PY - 2025

Y1 - 2025

N2 - This contribution explores the implications of the EU legal framework for the use of AI in health care, with a focus on the EU Artificial Intelligence Act. The AI Act, currently the most specific legal AI document, is not tailored to health care and the provisions that focus on the deployer (in this case the physician) lack specificity. Ultimately, we identify five elements for responsible AI usage in medical decision-making that, in our view, should be included in practical guidance, established by the medical profession.

AB - This contribution explores the implications of the EU legal framework for the use of AI in health care, with a focus on the EU Artificial Intelligence Act. The AI Act, currently the most specific legal AI document, is not tailored to health care and the provisions that focus on the deployer (in this case the physician) lack specificity. Ultimately, we identify five elements for responsible AI usage in medical decision-making that, in our view, should be included in practical guidance, established by the medical profession.

KW - artificial intelligence

KW - Artificial Intelligence Act

KW - legal framework

KW - physician

KW - responsibility

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105005746150

U2 - 10.1163/15718093-bja10143

DO - 10.1163/15718093-bja10143

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:105005746150

SN - 0929-0273

VL - 32

SP - 111

EP - 138

JO - European journal of health law

JF - European journal of health law

IS - 2

ER -

From European Standards to Responsible Use of AI in Clinical Practice

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this