From diagnostic conformity to co-narration of self-insight in mental health care

Nick J Ermers*, Gaston Franssen, Floor Scheepers, Nienke van Sambeek, Stefan van Geelen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In mental health care, large differences in perspective between individuals with psychosis and professionals are an everyday reality. Such discrepancies become apparent in the substantial number of patients judged to lack illness insight. This Perspective argues that ‘illness insight’ typically refers to patient conformity to medical views rather than denoting true understanding into their condition. We outline limitations of the current conceptualization of illness insight (‘clinical insight’) and discuss an alternative, narrative understanding, drawing on literature from various academic disciplines. After addressing definitional ambiguities, etiological complexities and methodological inconsistencies inherent to the current understanding, this paper highlights several normative, cultural and ethical issues surrounding clinical insight. A narrative approach allows patients to find more meaningful explanations that resonate better with the complexity of their experiences and tackles other problems identified with clinical insight. We argue that narrative insight is inherently co-constructed, emphasizing the shared meaning-making process between individuals with psychosis and professionals.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)883-892
JournalNature Mental Health
Volume2
Early online date30 Jul 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'From diagnostic conformity to co-narration of self-insight in mental health care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this