Follow-up of pulmonary right-to-left shunt in hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia

Veronique M.M. Vorselaars*, Sebastiaan Velthuis, Repke J. Snijder, Cornelis J.J. Westermann, Jan A. Vos, Johannes J. Mager, Martijn C. Post

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVMs) are associated with severe neurological complications in hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT). Transthoracic contrast echocardiography (TTCE) is recommended for screening of pulmonary right-to-left shunts (RLS). Although growth of PAVMs is shown in two small studies, no studies on follow-up with TTCE exist. All HHT patients underwent a second TTCE 5 years after initial screening. Patients with a history of PAVM embolisation were excluded. Pulmonary RLS grade on TTCE after 5 years was compared to the grade at screening. 200 patients (53.5% female, mean±SD age at screening 44.7±14.1 years) were included. Increase in RLS grade occurred in 36 (18%) patients, of whom six (17%) underwent embolisation. The change in grade between screening and follow-up was not more than one grade. Of patients with nontreatable pulmonary RLS at screening (n=113), 14 (12.4%) underwent embolisation. In patients without pulmonary RLS at initial screening (n=87), no treatable PAVMs developed during follow-up. Within 5 years, no treatable PAVMs developed in HHT patients without pulmonary RLS at initial screening. Increase in pulmonary RLS grade occurred in 18% of patients, and never increased by more than one grade. Of patients with nontreatable pulmonary RLS at initial screening, 12% underwent embolisation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1750-1757
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Respiratory Journal
Volume47
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Follow-up of pulmonary right-to-left shunt in hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this