Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

First-line treatment with infliximab versus conventional treatment in children with newly diagnosed moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease: an open-label multicentre randomised controlled trial

  • Maria M E Jongsma
  • , Martine A Aardoom
  • , Martinus A Cozijnsen
  • , Merel van Pieterson
  • , Tim de Meij
  • , Michael Groeneweg
  • , Obbe F Norbruis
  • , Victorien M Wolters
  • , Herbert M van Wering
  • , Iva Hojsak
  • , Kaija-Leena Kolho
  • , Thalia Hummel
  • , Janneke Stapelbroek
  • , Cathelijne van der Feen
  • , Patrick F van Rheenen
  • , Michiel P van Wijk
  • , Sarah T A Teklenburg-Roord
  • , Marco W J Schreurs
  • , Dimitris Rizopoulos
  • , Michail Doukas
  • Johanna C Escher, Janneke N Samsom, Lissy de Ridder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In newly diagnosed paediatric patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD), infliximab (IFX) is initiated once exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN), corticosteroid and immunomodulator therapies have failed. We aimed to investigate whether starting first-line IFX (FL-IFX) is more effective to achieve and maintain remission than conventional treatment. Design In this multicentre open-label randomised controlled trial, untreated patients with a new diagnosis of CD (3-17 years old, weighted Paediatric CD Activity Index score (wPCDAI) >40) were assigned to groups that received five infusions of 5 mg/kg IFX at weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22 (FL-IFX), or EEN or oral prednisolone (1 mg/kg, maximum 40 mg) (conventional). The primary outcome was clinical remission on azathioprine, defined as a wPCDAI <12.5 at week 52, without need for treatment escalation, using intention-to-treat analysis. Results 100 patients were included, 50 in the FL-IFX group and 50 in the conventional group. Four patients did not receive treatment as per protocol. At week 10, a higher proportion of patients in the FL-IFX group than in the conventional group achieved clinical (59% vs 34%, respectively, p=0.021) and endoscopic remission (59% vs 17%, respectively, p=0.001). At week 52, the proportion of patients in clinical remission was not significantly different (p=0.421). However, 19/46 (41%) patients in the FL-IFX group were in clinical remission on azathioprine monotherapy without need for treatment escalation vs 7/48 (15%) in the conventional group (p=0.004). Conclusions FL-IFX was superior to conventional treatment in achieving short-term clinical and endoscopic remission, and had greater likelihood of maintaining clinical remission at week 52 on azathioprine monotherapy. Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT02517684).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)34-42
Number of pages9
JournalGut
Volume71
Issue number1
Early online date31 Dec 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Dec 2020

Keywords

  • IBD clinical
  • inflammatory bowel disease
  • infliximab
  • paediatric gastroenterology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'First-line treatment with infliximab versus conventional treatment in children with newly diagnosed moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease: an open-label multicentre randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this