Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

External validation of the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE2) and SCORE2-Older Persons in cancer patients

  • Mari Nordbø Gynnild*
  • , Joris Holtrop
  • , Steven H J Hageman
  • , Victoria Vinje
  • , Jannick A N Dorresteijn
  • , Frank L J Visseren
  • , Espen Holte
  • , Håvard Dalen
  • , Torgeir Wethal
  • , Torbjørn Omland
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aims The 2022 European Society of Cardiology cardio-oncology guidelines recommend cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk stratification for cancer patients and suggest using SCORE2 and SCORE2-OP. However, these models have not been validated or specifically adapted for cancer populations. Our aim was to refine the SCORE2 and SCORE2-OP models to accurately predict 10-year fatal and non-fatal CVD risk in cancer patients. Methods and results We included 1622 patients from the HUNT3 study (2006–08) who were diagnosed with cancer within 4 years after their enrolment and followed until 2023 linked to national registries. The primary outcome was a composite of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or CVD mortality. Model performance was assessed using Harrel’s C-statistic and calibration curves. Both models were recalibrated by applying a multiplicative adjustment factor based on expected–observed (E/O) ratios. The most prevalent cancers were gastrointestinal (23%), prostate (17%), and breast (14%). Mean age was 65.2 years, 52% were female. During a median follow-up of 8.8 years [inter-quartile range 1.9–12.6], 252 CVD events (39% MI, 36% stroke, 25% CVD deaths) and 708 non-CVD deaths occurred. SCORE2 initially underestimated CVD risk (E/O ratio for men and women: 0.91 and 0.63, respectively) but showed adequate agreement after recalibration. C-statistics for SCORE2 was 0.693 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.643–0.743], and 0.730 (95% CI 0.676–0.784) after excluding those not surviving the first 2 years. For SCORE2-OP, the C-statistics were 0.586 (95% CI 0.529–0.643) and 0.648 (95% CI 0.577–0.720). Conclusion SCORE2 underestimated CVD risk in cancer patients. After recalibration, the model may serve as a valuable tool for risk stratification in cancer patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)500-510
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean journal of preventive cardiology
Volume33
Issue number4
Early online date23 Jun 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2026

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Cardio-oncology
  • Cardiotoxicity
  • Cardiovascular risk
  • Risk prediction
  • Risk stratification

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'External validation of the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE2) and SCORE2-Older Persons in cancer patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this