TY - JOUR
T1 - Exposure to diesel motor exhaust and lung cancer risk in a pooled analysis from case-control studies in Europe and Canada
AU - Olsson, Ann C.
AU - Gustavsson, Per
AU - Kromhout, Hans
AU - Peters, Susan
AU - Vermeulen, Roel
AU - Brüske, Irene
AU - Pesch, Beate
AU - Siemiatycki, Jack
AU - Pintos, Javier
AU - Brüning, Thomas
AU - Cassidy, Adrian
AU - Wichmann, Heinz Erich
AU - Consonni, Dario
AU - Landi, Maria Teresa
AU - Caporaso, Neil E
AU - Plato, Nils
AU - Merletti, Franco
AU - Mirabelli, Dario
AU - Richiardi, Lorenzo
AU - Jöckel, Karl Heinz
AU - Ahrens, Wolfgang
AU - Pohlabeln, Hermann
AU - Lissowska, Jolanta
AU - Szeszenia-Dabrowska, Neonila
AU - Zaridze, David
AU - Stücker, Isabelle
AU - Benhamou, Simone
AU - Bencko, Vladimir
AU - Foretova, Lenka
AU - Janout, Vladimir
AU - Rudnai, Peter
AU - Fabianova, Eleonora
AU - Dumitru, Rodica Stanescu
AU - Gross, Isabelle M.
AU - Kendzia, Benjamin
AU - Forastiere, Francesco
AU - Bueno-de-Mesquita, Bas
AU - Brennan, Paul
AU - Boffetta, Paolo
AU - Straif, Kurt
PY - 2011/4/1
Y1 - 2011/4/1
N2 - Rationale: Diesel motor exhaust is classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as probably carcinogenic to humans. The epidemiologic evidence is evaluated as limited because most studies lack adequate control for potential confounders and only a few studies have reported on exposure-response relationships. Objectives: Investigate lung cancer risk associated with occupational exposure to diesel motor exhaust, while controlling for potential confounders. Methods: The SYNERGY project pooled information on lifetime work histories and tobacco smoking from13,304 cases and 16,282 controls from 11 case-control studies conducted in Europe and Canada. A general population job exposure matrix based on ISCO-68 occupational codes, assigning no, low, or high exposure to diesel motor exhaust, was applied to determine level of exposure. Measurements and Main Results: Odds ratios of lung cancer and 95% confidence intervals were estimated by unconditional logistic regression, adjusted for age, sex, study, ever-employment in an occupation with established lung cancer risk, cigarette pack-years, and time-since-quitting smoking. Cumulative diesel exposure was associated with an increased lung cancer risk highest quartile versus unexposed (odds ratio 1.31; 95%confidence interval, 1.19-1.43), and a significant exposure-response relationship (P value < 0.01). Corresponding effect estimates were similar in workers never employed in occupations with established lung cancer risk, and in women and neversmokers, although not statistically significant. Conclusions: Our results show a consistent association between occupational exposure to diesel motor exhaust and increased risk of lung cancer. This association is unlikely explained by bias or confounding, which we addressed by adjusted models ands ubgroup analyses.
AB - Rationale: Diesel motor exhaust is classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as probably carcinogenic to humans. The epidemiologic evidence is evaluated as limited because most studies lack adequate control for potential confounders and only a few studies have reported on exposure-response relationships. Objectives: Investigate lung cancer risk associated with occupational exposure to diesel motor exhaust, while controlling for potential confounders. Methods: The SYNERGY project pooled information on lifetime work histories and tobacco smoking from13,304 cases and 16,282 controls from 11 case-control studies conducted in Europe and Canada. A general population job exposure matrix based on ISCO-68 occupational codes, assigning no, low, or high exposure to diesel motor exhaust, was applied to determine level of exposure. Measurements and Main Results: Odds ratios of lung cancer and 95% confidence intervals were estimated by unconditional logistic regression, adjusted for age, sex, study, ever-employment in an occupation with established lung cancer risk, cigarette pack-years, and time-since-quitting smoking. Cumulative diesel exposure was associated with an increased lung cancer risk highest quartile versus unexposed (odds ratio 1.31; 95%confidence interval, 1.19-1.43), and a significant exposure-response relationship (P value < 0.01). Corresponding effect estimates were similar in workers never employed in occupations with established lung cancer risk, and in women and neversmokers, although not statistically significant. Conclusions: Our results show a consistent association between occupational exposure to diesel motor exhaust and increased risk of lung cancer. This association is unlikely explained by bias or confounding, which we addressed by adjusted models ands ubgroup analyses.
KW - Epidemiologic studies
KW - Lung neoplasm
KW - Occupational exposure
KW - Vehicle emissions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79953309084&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1164/rccm.201006-0940OC
DO - 10.1164/rccm.201006-0940OC
M3 - Article
C2 - 21037020
AN - SCOPUS:79953309084
SN - 1073-449X
VL - 183
SP - 941
EP - 948
JO - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
JF - American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
IS - 7
ER -