TY - JOUR
T1 - Evidence for pathogenicity of BRCA2 c.8351G>A p.(Arg2784Gln) and the challenges in classification of pathogenic variants with reduced penetrance
AU - Moghadasi, Setareh
AU - Zanti, Maria
AU - Bleeker, Fonnet
AU - Blok, Marinus
AU - Braspenning, Merel E.
AU - Cerna, Marta
AU - Collee, Margriet J.
AU - Engel, Christoph
AU - Hopman, Saskia
AU - Kleiblova, Petra
AU - Koole, Wouter
AU - Mensenkamp, Arjen
AU - Overwater, Eline
AU - Palmero, Edenir Inez
AU - Snijders Blok, Lot
AU - Storm, Katrien
AU - Stringa, Najada
AU - Wevers, Marijke R.
AU - Vreeswijk, Maaike P.G.
AU - Goldgar, David
AU - Michailidou, Kyriaki
AU - Gómez García, Encarna B.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.
PY - 2026/2/20
Y1 - 2026/2/20
N2 - Background The BRCA2 c.8351G>Ap.(Arg2784Gln) variant has long been classified as a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) due to conflicting evidence used in variant classification. This study aims to clarify its pathogenicity and associated risks for breast and ovarian cancer. Methods This study was conducted by the international Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles consortium. We collected data from 29 informative families with this variant. Co-segregation likelihood ratios (LRs) were calculated using the full-likelihood method to assess pathogenicity, and cancer risks were estimated with modified segregation analysis. Results Co-segregation analysis using a grid search across scaled penetrance levels for BRCA2 truncating variants yielded the strongest evidence in favour of pathogenicity, with LR maximised at approximately 20% of full penetrance (LR=11.026). Furthermore, estimated breast cancer risks were markedly higher for early onset breast cancer; women diagnosed at <50 years had a HR of 4.5, compared with a HR of 1.65 for women diagnosed at ≥50 years. The estimated lifetime risks were 25% for breast cancer and 6% for ovarian cancer. Evidence of pathogenicity was also supported by the presence of the variant allele in two patients with Fanconi anaemia. Conclusions Our results indicate that BRCA2 c.8351G>Ap.(Arg2784Gln) has a disease-causing effect, with reduced penetrance, similar to other pathogenic variants in moderate risk breast cancer genes such as ATM and CHEK2. We also provide risk-adapted recommendations for clinical management. Importantly, one should be aware of a reduced penetrance as the underlying reason for conflicting results among pieces of evidence used for variant classification.
AB - Background The BRCA2 c.8351G>Ap.(Arg2784Gln) variant has long been classified as a variant of uncertain significance (VUS) due to conflicting evidence used in variant classification. This study aims to clarify its pathogenicity and associated risks for breast and ovarian cancer. Methods This study was conducted by the international Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles consortium. We collected data from 29 informative families with this variant. Co-segregation likelihood ratios (LRs) were calculated using the full-likelihood method to assess pathogenicity, and cancer risks were estimated with modified segregation analysis. Results Co-segregation analysis using a grid search across scaled penetrance levels for BRCA2 truncating variants yielded the strongest evidence in favour of pathogenicity, with LR maximised at approximately 20% of full penetrance (LR=11.026). Furthermore, estimated breast cancer risks were markedly higher for early onset breast cancer; women diagnosed at <50 years had a HR of 4.5, compared with a HR of 1.65 for women diagnosed at ≥50 years. The estimated lifetime risks were 25% for breast cancer and 6% for ovarian cancer. Evidence of pathogenicity was also supported by the presence of the variant allele in two patients with Fanconi anaemia. Conclusions Our results indicate that BRCA2 c.8351G>Ap.(Arg2784Gln) has a disease-causing effect, with reduced penetrance, similar to other pathogenic variants in moderate risk breast cancer genes such as ATM and CHEK2. We also provide risk-adapted recommendations for clinical management. Importantly, one should be aware of a reduced penetrance as the underlying reason for conflicting results among pieces of evidence used for variant classification.
KW - Disease Management
KW - Genetic Variation
KW - Genetics, Medical
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105026670372
U2 - 10.1136/jmg-2025-111145
DO - 10.1136/jmg-2025-111145
M3 - Article
C2 - 41412794
AN - SCOPUS:105026670372
SN - 0022-2593
VL - 63
SP - 157
EP - 163
JO - Journal of Medical Genetics
JF - Journal of Medical Genetics
IS - 3
ER -