TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of the Two-Way Communication Checklist as a clinical intervention
T2 - Results of a multinational, randomised controlled trial
AU - Van Os, Jim
AU - Altamura, A. Carlo
AU - Bobes, Julio
AU - Gerlach, Jes
AU - Hellewell, Jonathan S.E.
AU - Kasper, Siegfried
AU - Naber, Dieter
AU - Robert, Philippe
PY - 2004/1/1
Y1 - 2004/1/1
N2 - Background: Patients and doctors often have divergent views on care needs. Aims: To examine whether providing patients with an opportunity to identify and discuss their needs would improve communication and induce changes in care. Method: Patients with schizophrenia (n=134) were randomly allocated to either standard care or use of the Two-Way Communication Checklist (2-COM). Before seeing their clinician for a routine follow-up, participants in the active intervention group were given 2-COM, a list of 20 common needs, and told to indicate those areas they wanted to discuss with their doctor. Outcomes were assessed immediately and again after 6 weeks. Results: Using 2-COM induced a stable improvement of patient-reported quality of patient-doctor communication (B=0.33, P=0.031), and induced changes in management immediately after the intervention (OR=3.7, P=0.009; number needed to treat, 6). Treatment change was more likely in patients with more reported needs, and needs most likely to induce treatment change displayed stronger associations with non-medication than with medication changes. Conclusions: A simple intervention to aid people in discussion of their needs results in improved communication and changes in management.
AB - Background: Patients and doctors often have divergent views on care needs. Aims: To examine whether providing patients with an opportunity to identify and discuss their needs would improve communication and induce changes in care. Method: Patients with schizophrenia (n=134) were randomly allocated to either standard care or use of the Two-Way Communication Checklist (2-COM). Before seeing their clinician for a routine follow-up, participants in the active intervention group were given 2-COM, a list of 20 common needs, and told to indicate those areas they wanted to discuss with their doctor. Outcomes were assessed immediately and again after 6 weeks. Results: Using 2-COM induced a stable improvement of patient-reported quality of patient-doctor communication (B=0.33, P=0.031), and induced changes in management immediately after the intervention (OR=3.7, P=0.009; number needed to treat, 6). Treatment change was more likely in patients with more reported needs, and needs most likely to induce treatment change displayed stronger associations with non-medication than with medication changes. Conclusions: A simple intervention to aid people in discussion of their needs results in improved communication and changes in management.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0346373686&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1192/bjp.184.1.79
DO - 10.1192/bjp.184.1.79
M3 - Article
C2 - 14702232
AN - SCOPUS:0346373686
SN - 0007-1250
VL - 184
SP - 79
EP - 83
JO - British Journal of Psychiatry
JF - British Journal of Psychiatry
IS - JAN.
ER -