TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the Gap-Overlap Task in 10-Month-Old Infants
AU - Cousijn, Janna
AU - Hessels, Roy S.
AU - Van der Stigchel, Stefan
AU - Kemner, Chantal
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank Prof. Mark Johnson, Dr. Emily Jones and Dr. Luke Mason, Centre for Brain & Cognitive Development, Birkbeck, University of London for sharing the gap-overlap infant paradigm and for their help in designing and programming the task. Furthermore, we would like to thank all employees of the Kinder Kennis Centrum, Utrecht University for their help during the data collection. This project was supported by the Consortium Individual Development (CID) and by the Utrecht University, through the strategic theme ?Dynamics of Youth?. CID is funded through the Gravitation program of the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture, and Science and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO grant number 024.001.003 awarded to Chantal Kemner, Utrecht University, The Netherlands).
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © International Congress of Infant Studies (ICIS)
Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/7/1
Y1 - 2017/7/1
N2 - Understanding the development of attention is key to understanding cognitive maturation. The gap-overlap task can be administered at all ages and is widely used to study the development of overt visual attention. However, studies using the gap-overlap task report different measures and little is known about the tasks’ psychometric properties, especially in infants. We tested the 1-week test–retest reliability of two frequently used gap-overlap measures of attentional disengagement in 10-month-old infants; the gap effect as measured by the difference between the gap and overlap condition and the gap effect as measured by the difference between the gap and baseline condition. Sixty-seven infants performed the gap-overlap task twice, of which 45 infants had sufficient data quality for further analyses. Test–retest reliability of the overlap-gap gap effect was higher (r =.50) than the baseline-gap gap effect (r =.29). Moreover, the shared variance between overlap and baseline saccadic reaction times was moderate to high across sessions. In light of these results and the methodological challenges and limitations of infant research, we consider the overlap-gap gap effect to be a good measure to study the development of attentional disengagement in infants and suggest the exclusion of the baseline condition in future studies.
AB - Understanding the development of attention is key to understanding cognitive maturation. The gap-overlap task can be administered at all ages and is widely used to study the development of overt visual attention. However, studies using the gap-overlap task report different measures and little is known about the tasks’ psychometric properties, especially in infants. We tested the 1-week test–retest reliability of two frequently used gap-overlap measures of attentional disengagement in 10-month-old infants; the gap effect as measured by the difference between the gap and overlap condition and the gap effect as measured by the difference between the gap and baseline condition. Sixty-seven infants performed the gap-overlap task twice, of which 45 infants had sufficient data quality for further analyses. Test–retest reliability of the overlap-gap gap effect was higher (r =.50) than the baseline-gap gap effect (r =.29). Moreover, the shared variance between overlap and baseline saccadic reaction times was moderate to high across sessions. In light of these results and the methodological challenges and limitations of infant research, we consider the overlap-gap gap effect to be a good measure to study the development of attentional disengagement in infants and suggest the exclusion of the baseline condition in future studies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017350481&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/infa.12185
DO - 10.1111/infa.12185
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85017350481
SN - 1525-0008
VL - 22
SP - 571
EP - 579
JO - Infancy
JF - Infancy
IS - 4
ER -