TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of Neuromuscular Diseases and Complaints by Quantitative Muscle MRI
AU - Schlaffke, Lara
AU - Rehmann, Robert
AU - Güttsches, Anne Katrin
AU - Vorgerd, Matthias
AU - Meyer-Frießem, Christine H.
AU - Dinse, Hubert R.
AU - Enax-Krumova, Elena
AU - Froeling, Martijn
AU - Forsting, Johannes
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 by the authors.
PY - 2024/4
Y1 - 2024/4
N2 - Background: Quantitative muscle MRI (qMRI) is a promising tool for evaluating and monitoring neuromuscular disorders (NMD). However, the application of different imaging protocols and processing pipelines restricts comparison between patient cohorts and disorders. In this qMRI study, we aim to compare dystrophic (limb-girdle muscular dystrophy), inflammatory (inclusion body myositis), and metabolic myopathy (Pompe disease) as well as patients with post-COVID-19 conditions suffering from myalgia to healthy controls. Methods: Ten subjects of each group underwent a 3T lower extremity muscle MRI, including a multi-echo, gradient-echo, Dixon-based sequence, a multi-echo, spin-echo (MESE) T2 mapping sequence, and a spin-echo EPI diffusion-weighted sequence. Furthermore, the following clinical assessments were performed: Quick Motor Function Measure, patient questionnaires for daily life activities, and 6-min walking distance. Results: Different involvement patterns of conspicuous qMRI parameters for different NMDs were observed. qMRI metrics correlated significantly with clinical assessments. Conclusions: qMRI metrics are suitable for evaluating patients with NMD since they show differences in muscular involvement in different NMDs and correlate with clinical assessments. Still, standardisation of acquisition and processing is needed for broad clinical use.
AB - Background: Quantitative muscle MRI (qMRI) is a promising tool for evaluating and monitoring neuromuscular disorders (NMD). However, the application of different imaging protocols and processing pipelines restricts comparison between patient cohorts and disorders. In this qMRI study, we aim to compare dystrophic (limb-girdle muscular dystrophy), inflammatory (inclusion body myositis), and metabolic myopathy (Pompe disease) as well as patients with post-COVID-19 conditions suffering from myalgia to healthy controls. Methods: Ten subjects of each group underwent a 3T lower extremity muscle MRI, including a multi-echo, gradient-echo, Dixon-based sequence, a multi-echo, spin-echo (MESE) T2 mapping sequence, and a spin-echo EPI diffusion-weighted sequence. Furthermore, the following clinical assessments were performed: Quick Motor Function Measure, patient questionnaires for daily life activities, and 6-min walking distance. Results: Different involvement patterns of conspicuous qMRI parameters for different NMDs were observed. qMRI metrics correlated significantly with clinical assessments. Conclusions: qMRI metrics are suitable for evaluating patients with NMD since they show differences in muscular involvement in different NMDs and correlate with clinical assessments. Still, standardisation of acquisition and processing is needed for broad clinical use.
KW - inclusion body myositis
KW - limb-girdle muscular dystrophy
KW - muscle diffusion tensor imaging
KW - neuromuscular disorders
KW - Pompe disease
KW - post-COVID-19-condition
KW - quantitative muscle MRI
KW - skeletal muscle
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85190152957&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/jcm13071958
DO - 10.3390/jcm13071958
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85190152957
SN - 2077-0383
VL - 13
JO - Journal of Clinical medicine
JF - Journal of Clinical medicine
IS - 7
M1 - 1958
ER -