TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of MRI technologies for surgical spine planning and navigation
AU - Rommelspacher, Yorck
AU - Schulte, André Pascal
AU - Tanner, Stephan
AU - Schellhammer, Frank
AU - Kling, Sabine
AU - Seevinck, Peter
AU - Gironés Sangüesa, Marta
AU - Strauss, Andreas Christian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2025.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Purpose: CT is considered the gold standard to assess bone morphology, whereas MRI is the imaging modality of choice to assess soft tissue. To reduce the ionising radiation exposure of the patient from CT, new MRI technologies have been developed to obtain images of bone. Two promising methods include MRI-based synthetic CT (sCT) and T1-weighted isotropic MRI. Methods: A prospective study including twenty-four adult patients receiving lumbar or sacral spine stabilisation surgery was performed. For each patient, two scans were acquired: a 3D dual echo T1-weighted gradient image, from which a sCT was reconstructed, and a 3D isotropic T1-weighted MRI sequence. Three observers assessed the sCT images for adequate visualisation of relevant vertebral anatomies and confidence using sCT in preoperative planning compared to the isotropic MRI based on a series of statements scored using a Likert-scale. Summary statistics and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated. Results: All observers agreed that the sCT provided adequate visualization (94% of cases). Compared to the isotropic MRI, the sCT provided added value (89% of cases) and improved confidence (92% of cases) for the preoperative planning stage. No unexpected poor intraclass correlations were identified. The observers diagnosed patients with spondylolysis, scoliosis, arthrosis, spina bifida occulta, various Castellvi classifications, or without pathology. Conclusions: sCT adequately visualised vertebral structures relevant for surgical spine planning with good confidence and added value for sCT compared to 3D T1-weighted isotropic MRI is shown. sCT could be a valuable method to reduce the radiation exposure associated with CT.
AB - Purpose: CT is considered the gold standard to assess bone morphology, whereas MRI is the imaging modality of choice to assess soft tissue. To reduce the ionising radiation exposure of the patient from CT, new MRI technologies have been developed to obtain images of bone. Two promising methods include MRI-based synthetic CT (sCT) and T1-weighted isotropic MRI. Methods: A prospective study including twenty-four adult patients receiving lumbar or sacral spine stabilisation surgery was performed. For each patient, two scans were acquired: a 3D dual echo T1-weighted gradient image, from which a sCT was reconstructed, and a 3D isotropic T1-weighted MRI sequence. Three observers assessed the sCT images for adequate visualisation of relevant vertebral anatomies and confidence using sCT in preoperative planning compared to the isotropic MRI based on a series of statements scored using a Likert-scale. Summary statistics and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated. Results: All observers agreed that the sCT provided adequate visualization (94% of cases). Compared to the isotropic MRI, the sCT provided added value (89% of cases) and improved confidence (92% of cases) for the preoperative planning stage. No unexpected poor intraclass correlations were identified. The observers diagnosed patients with spondylolysis, scoliosis, arthrosis, spina bifida occulta, various Castellvi classifications, or without pathology. Conclusions: sCT adequately visualised vertebral structures relevant for surgical spine planning with good confidence and added value for sCT compared to 3D T1-weighted isotropic MRI is shown. sCT could be a valuable method to reduce the radiation exposure associated with CT.
KW - Lumbar spine
KW - Magnetic resonance imaging
KW - Qualitative analysis
KW - Surgical navigation
KW - Surgical planning
KW - Synthetic computed tomography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85218269458&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00586-025-08703-5
DO - 10.1007/s00586-025-08703-5
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85218269458
SN - 0940-6719
VL - 34
SP - 1447
EP - 1454
JO - European Spine Journal
JF - European Spine Journal
IS - 4
ER -