Abstract
Objective: To evaluate implementation of the FIGO Nutrition Checklist in a low/middle-income South African setting. Methods: This is a mixed-methods study. Following administration of the FIGO Nutrition Checklist by a dietitian between July 2021 and May 2022, quantitative responses from pregnant (n = 96) and nonpregnant (n = 291) participants with overweight or obesity were analyzed, using logistic regression. Qualitative data from in-depth interviews with the dietitian and a subgroup of participants (n = 15) were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Of 387 participants, 97.4% (n = 377) answered ‘no’ to at least one diet quality question on the FIGO Nutrition Checklist, indicative of an at-risk dietary practice. Food insecurity was positively associated with having more than three at-risk practices (OR 1.87; 95% CI, 1.10–3.18; P = 0.021). Themes from the dietitian interview included ease of use of the checklist; required adaptations to it, including explanation and translation; and benefits of the tool. Despite challenges to healthy nutrition, participant interviews identified that the checklist is acceptable and supported improved awareness of dietary intakes. Conclusion: Considering the high incidence of at-risk dietary practices identified by the FIGO Nutrition Checklist in this population, further research into use of the tool across South African healthcare settings is warranted.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 68-79 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics |
Volume | 160 |
Issue number | S1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2023 |
Keywords
- acceptability
- FIGO Nutrition Checklist
- mixed methods
- nutrition
- obesity
- preconception
- pregnancy
- screening tool