European standard clinical practice – Key issues for the medical care of individuals with familial leukemia

Although hematologic malignancies (HM) are no longer considered exclusively sporadic, additional awareness of familial cases has yet to be created. Individuals carrying a (likely) pathogenic germline variant (e.g., in ETV6, GATA2, SAMD9, SAMD9L, or RUNX1) are at an increased risk for developing HM. Given the clinical and psychological impact associated with the diagnosis of a genetic predisposition to HM, it is of utmost importance to provide high-quality, standardized patient care. To address these issues and harmonize care across Europe, the Familial Leukemia Subnetwork within the ERN PaedCan has been assigned to draft an European Standard Clinical Practice (ESCP) document reflecting current best practices for pediatric patients and (healthy) relatives with (suspected) familial leukemia. The group was supported by members of the German network for rare diseases MyPred, of the Host Genome Working Group of SIOPE, and of the COST action LEGEND. The ESCP on familial leukemia is proposed by an interdisciplinary team of experts including hematologists, oncologists, and human geneticists. It is intended to provide general recommendations in areas where disease-specific recommendations do not yet exist. Here, we describe key issues for the medical care of familial leukemia that shall pave the way for a future consensus guideline: (i) identification of individuals with or suggestive of familial leukemia, (ii) genetic analysis and variant interpretation, (iii) genetic counseling and patient education, and (iv) surveillance and (psychological) support. To address the question on how to proceed with individuals suggestive of or at risk of familial leukemia, we developed an algorithm covering four different, partially linked clinical scenarios, and additionally a decision tree to guide clinicians in their considerations regarding familial leukemia in minors with HM. Our recommendations cover, not only patients but also relatives that both should have access to adequate medical care. We illustrate the importance of natural history studies and the need for respective registries for future evidence-based recommendations that shall be updated as new evidence-based standards are established.