TY - JOUR
T1 - Estimation of accumulated dose to organs at risk in head and neck cancer patients treated with scheduled replanning and dose painting in the ARTFORCE trial
AU - de Leeuw, Anna Liza M.P.
AU - van Kranen, Simon R.
AU - Giralt, Jordi
AU - Tao, Yungan
AU - Benavente, Sergi
AU - Nguyen, Thanh Vân F.
AU - Hoebers, Frank J.P.
AU - Hoeben, Ann
AU - Terhaard, Chris H.J.
AU - Lee, Lip Wai
AU - Friesland, Signe
AU - Steenbakkers, Roel J.H.M.
AU - Bartelink, Harry
AU - Rasch, Coen R.N.
AU - Sonke, Jan Jakob
AU - Hamming-Vrieze, Olga
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Ziekenhuis. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Society of Radiotherapy & Oncology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
PY - 2026/5
Y1 - 2026/5
N2 - Background and purpose: This study investigated whether scheduled adaptive radiotherapy (ART) improved delivered dose to organs at risk (OAR) in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer treated with dose painting (DP). Materials and methods: Delivered doses were estimated for 81 patients who were prospectively treated with DP + ART using deformable image registration between CBCT and the planning CT’s. Three simulations were conducted, evaluating (1) a scenario without replanning (SimnoART), (2) a scenario with ART at fraction 12 (SimART), and (3) the clinical practice with ad hoc replanning (Simdelivered). It was further evaluated whether selecting patients for ART using accumulated dose in the first 10 fractions (Df10) to the parotid glands and larynx would improve ART efficacy. Results: In SimnoART, 41% of patients had delivered dose deviations ≥ 3 Gy compared to the planned dose in any OAR, primarily in the parotid glands and larynx. No significant differences were seen between SimnoART, SimART and Simdelivered (P ≥ 0.10). Df10 predicted relevant changes upon completing treatment with AUC ≥ 0.95. By selecting patients for ART using Df10, delivered dose significantly improved for the larynx (P ≤ 0.01). Conclusions: Although relevant dose differences between planned and delivered doses were seen in almost half of the patients without ART, minimal improvements in delivered doses were seen introducing ART. Nonetheless, Df10 was prognostic for relevant changes upon completing treatment and selecting patients for ART significantly improved larynx dose. Incorporating accumulated dose into patient selection for ART could help avoid unforeseen increases in delivered dose.
AB - Background and purpose: This study investigated whether scheduled adaptive radiotherapy (ART) improved delivered dose to organs at risk (OAR) in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer treated with dose painting (DP). Materials and methods: Delivered doses were estimated for 81 patients who were prospectively treated with DP + ART using deformable image registration between CBCT and the planning CT’s. Three simulations were conducted, evaluating (1) a scenario without replanning (SimnoART), (2) a scenario with ART at fraction 12 (SimART), and (3) the clinical practice with ad hoc replanning (Simdelivered). It was further evaluated whether selecting patients for ART using accumulated dose in the first 10 fractions (Df10) to the parotid glands and larynx would improve ART efficacy. Results: In SimnoART, 41% of patients had delivered dose deviations ≥ 3 Gy compared to the planned dose in any OAR, primarily in the parotid glands and larynx. No significant differences were seen between SimnoART, SimART and Simdelivered (P ≥ 0.10). Df10 predicted relevant changes upon completing treatment with AUC ≥ 0.95. By selecting patients for ART using Df10, delivered dose significantly improved for the larynx (P ≤ 0.01). Conclusions: Although relevant dose differences between planned and delivered doses were seen in almost half of the patients without ART, minimal improvements in delivered doses were seen introducing ART. Nonetheless, Df10 was prognostic for relevant changes upon completing treatment and selecting patients for ART significantly improved larynx dose. Incorporating accumulated dose into patient selection for ART could help avoid unforeseen increases in delivered dose.
KW - Adaptive radiotherapy
KW - Dose painting
KW - Head and neck cancer
KW - Replanning
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105037601817
U2 - 10.1016/j.phro.2026.100957
DO - 10.1016/j.phro.2026.100957
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105037601817
SN - 2405-6316
VL - 39
JO - Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
JF - Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
M1 - 100957
ER -