Estimated clinical benefit of combining highly conformal target volumes with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) versus conventional flank irradiation in pediatric renal tumors

Joeri Mul*, Enrica Seravalli, Mirjam E. Bosman, Cornelis P. van de Ven, Annemieke S. Littooij, Martine van Grotel, Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Geert O. Janssens

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: For decades, Anterior-Posterior/Posterior-Anterior (AP/PA) photon beams were standard-of-care for flank irradiation in children with renal cancer. Recently, highly conformal flank target volumes were defined correcting for postoperative organ shift and intra-fraction motion.By radiotherapy treatment plan comparison, this study aims to estimate the clinical benefits and potential risks of combining highly conformal target volumes with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) versus conventional target volumes with AP/PA beams for flank irradiation.

Materials and Methods: Twenty consecutive renal tumor cases (left/right-sided:10/10; median age:3.2 years) were selected. Highly conformal flank target volumes were generated for VMAT, while conventional target volumes were used for AP/PA. For each case, the dose to the organs at risk (OARs) and Total Body Volume (TBV) was calculated to compare VMAT with AP/PA treatment plans for a prescribed dose (PD) of 14.4/1.8 Gy. Dose constraint violation of the tail of the pancreas and spleen (D mean < 10 Gy), heart (D 50 < 5 Gy) or mammary buds (D mean < 10 Gy) were prioritized as potentially beneficial for clinics.

Results: Highly conformal Planning Target Volumes (PTV) were smaller than conventional volumes (mean ΔPTV AP/PA-PTV VMAT: 555 mL, Δ60%, p=<0.01). A mean dose reduction favoring VMAT was observed for almost all OARs. Dose constraints to the tail of the pancreas, spleen, heart and mammary buds were fulfilled in 8/20, 12/20, 16/20 and 19/20 cases with AP/PA, versus 14/20, 17/20, 20/20 and 20/20 cases with VMAT, respectively. In 12/20 cases, VMAT prevented the dose constraint violation of one or more OARs otherwise exceeded by AP/PA. VMAT increased the TBV receiving 10% of the PD, but reduced the amount of irradiated TBV for all higher doses.

Conclusion: Compared to 14.4 Gy flank irradiation using conventional AP/PA photon beams, an estimated clinical benefit by dose reduction to the OARs can be expected in 60% of the pediatric renal tumor cases using highly conformal flank target volumes combined with VMAT.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)20-26
Number of pages7
JournalClinical and translational radiation oncology
Volume29
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2021

Keywords

  • Conformal radiotherapy
  • Organs at risk
  • Pediatric renal tumors
  • Side-effects
  • VMAT
  • Wilms tumor

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Estimated clinical benefit of combining highly conformal target volumes with Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) versus conventional flank irradiation in pediatric renal tumors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this