Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

ESMO Basic Requirements for AI-based Biomarkers In Oncology (EBAI)

  • M Aldea
  • , M Salto-Tellez
  • , A Marra
  • , R Umeton
  • , A Stenzinger
  • , M Koopman
  • , A Prelaj
  • , K L Kehl
  • , S Gilbert
  • , M-E Leßmann
  • , J Lipkova
  • , L Provenzano
  • , F Meric-Bernstam
  • , S Halabi
  • , J Wu
  • , A Pellat
  • , K P M Suijkerbuijk
  • , B Besse
  • , B Ryll
  • , C Marchió
  • M Crispin-Ortuzar, R Fehrmann, J Vibert, D Ferber, C Pauli, A Valachis, Federica Corso, T J Brinker, J Mateo, N Harbeck, E C Winkler, F Lopez-Rios, R Perez-Lopez, G Pentheroudakis, S Delaloge, C Benedikt Westphalen, J N Kather

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

11 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is expected to introduce an increasing number of biomarkers in oncology. To bridge the gap between oncology and computer science, it is timely to define recommendations for AI-based biomarkers suitable for routine clinical use. Here, we propose the ESMO (European Society for Medical Oncology) Basic Requirements for AI-based Biomarkers In Oncology (EBAI). Design: The EBAI framework was developed using a modified Delphi methodology, involving a multidisciplinary panel of 37 experts who participated in four structured consensus rounds. Results: AI-based biomarkers were classified as ‘class A’ (AI quantification of established biomarkers), ‘class B’ (indirect measure of known biomarkers using AI-based alternative methods, to be deployed as pre-screening tests), and ‘class C’ (novel AI-derived biomarkers, with C1 for prognosis and C2 for prediction of treatment effect). The EBAI framework addresses AI biomarkers for clinical use. Ground truth, performance, and generalisability were considered essential; fairness was recommended. Minimal validation requirements indicate that class A requires concordance studies, class B analytical validation, class C1 high-quality retrospective real-world or clinical trial data, and class C2 additionally requires clinical validation in prospective clinical trials for the prediction of response to a new treatment. All biomarker studies should report multiple evaluation and calibration metrics, with a clearly defined primary objective. Generalisability should be demonstrated across all intended use settings, including variability in data acquisition, post-processing, and population characteristics. Biomarkers must not be applied to other cancer types or modalities without supporting evidence. Conclusions: EBAI defines criteria for AI-based biomarker adoption in routine use, providing a common language for physicians, AI developers, and researchers.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)414-430
Number of pages17
JournalAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology
Volume37
Issue number3
Early online date31 Dec 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2026

Keywords

  • EBAI
  • scale
  • cancer
  • biomarker
  • artificial intelligence
  • validation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'ESMO Basic Requirements for AI-based Biomarkers In Oncology (EBAI)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this