TY - JOUR
T1 - ESMO Basic Requirements for AI-based Biomarkers In Oncology (EBAI)
AU - Aldea, M
AU - Salto-Tellez, M
AU - Marra, A
AU - Umeton, R
AU - Stenzinger, A
AU - Koopman, M
AU - Prelaj, A
AU - Kehl, K L
AU - Gilbert, S
AU - Leßmann, M-E
AU - Lipkova, J
AU - Provenzano, L
AU - Meric-Bernstam, F
AU - Halabi, S
AU - Wu, J
AU - Pellat, A
AU - Suijkerbuijk, K P M
AU - Besse, B
AU - Ryll, B
AU - Marchió, C
AU - Crispin-Ortuzar, M
AU - Fehrmann, R
AU - Vibert, J
AU - Ferber, D
AU - Pauli, C
AU - Valachis, A
AU - Corso, Federica
AU - Brinker, T J
AU - Mateo, J
AU - Harbeck, N
AU - Winkler, E C
AU - Lopez-Rios, F
AU - Perez-Lopez, R
AU - Pentheroudakis, G
AU - Delaloge, S
AU - Benedikt Westphalen, C
AU - Kather, J N
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society for Medical Oncology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
PY - 2026/3
Y1 - 2026/3
N2 - Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is expected to introduce an increasing number of biomarkers in oncology. To bridge the gap between oncology and computer science, it is timely to define recommendations for AI-based biomarkers suitable for routine clinical use. Here, we propose the ESMO (European Society for Medical Oncology) Basic Requirements for AI-based Biomarkers In Oncology (EBAI). Design: The EBAI framework was developed using a modified Delphi methodology, involving a multidisciplinary panel of 37 experts who participated in four structured consensus rounds. Results: AI-based biomarkers were classified as ‘class A’ (AI quantification of established biomarkers), ‘class B’ (indirect measure of known biomarkers using AI-based alternative methods, to be deployed as pre-screening tests), and ‘class C’ (novel AI-derived biomarkers, with C1 for prognosis and C2 for prediction of treatment effect). The EBAI framework addresses AI biomarkers for clinical use. Ground truth, performance, and generalisability were considered essential; fairness was recommended. Minimal validation requirements indicate that class A requires concordance studies, class B analytical validation, class C1 high-quality retrospective real-world or clinical trial data, and class C2 additionally requires clinical validation in prospective clinical trials for the prediction of response to a new treatment. All biomarker studies should report multiple evaluation and calibration metrics, with a clearly defined primary objective. Generalisability should be demonstrated across all intended use settings, including variability in data acquisition, post-processing, and population characteristics. Biomarkers must not be applied to other cancer types or modalities without supporting evidence. Conclusions: EBAI defines criteria for AI-based biomarker adoption in routine use, providing a common language for physicians, AI developers, and researchers.
AB - Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is expected to introduce an increasing number of biomarkers in oncology. To bridge the gap between oncology and computer science, it is timely to define recommendations for AI-based biomarkers suitable for routine clinical use. Here, we propose the ESMO (European Society for Medical Oncology) Basic Requirements for AI-based Biomarkers In Oncology (EBAI). Design: The EBAI framework was developed using a modified Delphi methodology, involving a multidisciplinary panel of 37 experts who participated in four structured consensus rounds. Results: AI-based biomarkers were classified as ‘class A’ (AI quantification of established biomarkers), ‘class B’ (indirect measure of known biomarkers using AI-based alternative methods, to be deployed as pre-screening tests), and ‘class C’ (novel AI-derived biomarkers, with C1 for prognosis and C2 for prediction of treatment effect). The EBAI framework addresses AI biomarkers for clinical use. Ground truth, performance, and generalisability were considered essential; fairness was recommended. Minimal validation requirements indicate that class A requires concordance studies, class B analytical validation, class C1 high-quality retrospective real-world or clinical trial data, and class C2 additionally requires clinical validation in prospective clinical trials for the prediction of response to a new treatment. All biomarker studies should report multiple evaluation and calibration metrics, with a clearly defined primary objective. Generalisability should be demonstrated across all intended use settings, including variability in data acquisition, post-processing, and population characteristics. Biomarkers must not be applied to other cancer types or modalities without supporting evidence. Conclusions: EBAI defines criteria for AI-based biomarker adoption in routine use, providing a common language for physicians, AI developers, and researchers.
KW - EBAI
KW - scale
KW - cancer
KW - biomarker
KW - artificial intelligence
KW - validation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105030165164
U2 - 10.1016/j.annonc.2025.11.009
DO - 10.1016/j.annonc.2025.11.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 41260261
SN - 0923-7534
VL - 37
SP - 414
EP - 430
JO - Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology
JF - Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology
IS - 3
ER -