Epidemiology and outcomes of source control procedures in critically ill patients with intra-abdominal infection

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the characteristics and procedural outcomes of source control interventions among Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients with severe intra-abdominal-infection (IAI).

MATERIAL AND METHODS: We identified consecutive patients with suspected IAI in whom a source control intervention had been performed in two tertiary ICUs in the Netherlands, and performed retrospective in-depth case reviews to evaluate procedure type, diagnostic yield, and adequacy of source control after 14 days.

RESULTS: A total of 785 procedures were observed among 353 patients, with initial interventions involving 266 (75%) surgical versus 87 (25%) percutaneous approaches. Surgical index procedures typically involved IAI of (presumed) gastrointestinal origin (72%), whereas percutaneous index procedures were mostly performed for infections of the biliary tract/pancreas (50%) or peritoneal cavity (33%). Overall, 178 (50%) patients required multiple interventions (median 3 (IQR 2-4)). In a subgroup of 236 patients having their first procedure upon ICU admission, effective source control was ultimately achieved for 159 (67%) subjects. Persistence of organ failure was associated with inadequacy of source control at day 14, whereas trends in inflammatory markers were non-predictive.

CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of ICU patients with IAI require more than one intervention, yet successful source control is eventually achieved in a majority of cases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)258-264
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Critical Care
Volume52
Early online date12 Mar 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2019

Keywords

  • Critically ill
  • Epidemiology
  • Intra-abdominal infection
  • Sepsis
  • Surgery
  • Therapy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Epidemiology and outcomes of source control procedures in critically ill patients with intra-abdominal infection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this