Enemas, suppositories and rectal stimulation are not effective in accelerating enteral feeding or meconium evacuation in low-birthweight infants: a systematic review

Kim Kamphorst, Ydelette Sietsma, Annemieke J Brouwer, Paul J T Rood, Agnes van den Hoogen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Early full enteral feeding in preterm infants decreases morbidity and mortality. Our systematic review covered the effectiveness of rectal stimulation, suppositories and enemas on stooling patterns and feeding tolerance in low-birthweight infants born at up to 32 weeks. It comprised seven studies published between 2007 and 2014 and covered 495 infants.

CONCLUSION: Suppositories were ineffective in shortening the time to reach full enteral feeding, and the evidence on enemas was contradictory. Enemas and rectal stimulation did not shorten the time until complete meconium evacuation was reached. Further research into safe, effective interventions to accelerate meconium excretion is needed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1280-1287
Number of pages8
JournalActa Paediatrica
Volume105
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2016

Keywords

  • Enemas
  • Feeding tolerance
  • Low-birthweight infants
  • Meconium excretion
  • Suppositories

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Enemas, suppositories and rectal stimulation are not effective in accelerating enteral feeding or meconium evacuation in low-birthweight infants: a systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this