TY - JOUR
T1 - Endovascular treatment of peripheral arterial disease
T2 - Endo-STAR framework for the design, conduct, and reporting of trials
AU - Zywicka, Ewa M.
AU - Moore, Andrew J.
AU - Twine, Christopher
AU - Behrendt, Christian Alexander
AU - Bosiers, Michel
AU - Brodmann, Marianne
AU - Choke, Edward
AU - Deborst, Gert J.
AU - Diamantopoulos, Athanasios
AU - Enzmann, Florian
AU - Farber, Alik
AU - Ansel, Gary
AU - Gattuso, Dario
AU - Goh, Gerard S.
AU - Yann, Goueffic
AU - Jansen, Shirley
AU - Landini, Mario
AU - Lejay, Anne
AU - Lichtenberg, Michael
AU - Menard, Matthew
AU - Mezes, Peter
AU - Mills, Joseph
AU - Nixon, Jane
AU - Nordanstig, Joakim
AU - O'connell, Kelly
AU - Ozdemir, Baris
AU - Patrone, Lorenzo
AU - Puppala, Sapna
AU - Saratzis, Athanasios
AU - Secemsky, Eric A.
AU - Sigrid, Nikol
AU - Stavroulakis, Konstantinos
AU - Steiner, Sabine
AU - Teraa, Martin
AU - Van Herzeele, Isabelle
AU - Venermo, Maarit
AU - Zeller, Thomas
AU - Mouton, Ronelle
AU - Hinchliffe, Robert J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Foundation Ltd.
PY - 2025/4/1
Y1 - 2025/4/1
N2 - Background: Endovascular technologies continue to evolve to meet the large and growing burden of peripheral arterial disease. The overall quality of published RCTs in endovascular treatments for peripheral arterial disease is low, resulting in uncertainty over treatment effectiveness. The aim of this study was to develop a framework to improve the design, conduct, and reporting of future clinical trials for infrainguinal endovascular treatments of peripheral arterial disease. Methods: The authors undertook the design, development, and pilot testing of a novel framework. The study comprised four distinct phases. Phase 1 represented the development of a preliminary framework using content analysis of endovascular interventions described in previously published RCTs. Phase 2 consisted of focus groups with key stakeholders to further develop, revise, and achieve initial consensus on the framework. Phase 3 corresponded to the creation of a modified Delphi questionnaire to achieve final consensus on the framework. Phase 4 included cognitive interviews with professionals designing or undertaking endovascular lower limb trials to pilot test the framework. Results: Content analysis of 228 endovascular interventions from 112 RCTs identified six key themes, relevant to endovascular peripheral arterial disease interventions, for the framework: expertise; setting; anaesthesia; imaging; intervention components (access; crossing lesion; treating lesion (lesion preparation; intervention; intervention optimization; bailout intervention; and treatment of non-target lesions); and closure of artery); and pharmacological interventions. Further refinements were made to the framework as a result of feedback from three focus groups and a Delphi questionnaire. The framework deconstructs an endovascular intervention into its component parts. The final framework can be accessed at www.endo-star.com. Pilot testing evaluated comprehension, clarity, and completeness of interpretation. Conclusion: The Endo-STAR framework deconstructs endovascular interventions into their key component parts and has been designed and pilot tested to enhance the quality of RCTs of endovascular interventions in peripheral arterial disease. It may be used to assist in developing future trial protocols, the standardization of infrainguinal endovascular interventions, the monitoring of adherence to the trial protocol, and as a standardized reporting guideline.
AB - Background: Endovascular technologies continue to evolve to meet the large and growing burden of peripheral arterial disease. The overall quality of published RCTs in endovascular treatments for peripheral arterial disease is low, resulting in uncertainty over treatment effectiveness. The aim of this study was to develop a framework to improve the design, conduct, and reporting of future clinical trials for infrainguinal endovascular treatments of peripheral arterial disease. Methods: The authors undertook the design, development, and pilot testing of a novel framework. The study comprised four distinct phases. Phase 1 represented the development of a preliminary framework using content analysis of endovascular interventions described in previously published RCTs. Phase 2 consisted of focus groups with key stakeholders to further develop, revise, and achieve initial consensus on the framework. Phase 3 corresponded to the creation of a modified Delphi questionnaire to achieve final consensus on the framework. Phase 4 included cognitive interviews with professionals designing or undertaking endovascular lower limb trials to pilot test the framework. Results: Content analysis of 228 endovascular interventions from 112 RCTs identified six key themes, relevant to endovascular peripheral arterial disease interventions, for the framework: expertise; setting; anaesthesia; imaging; intervention components (access; crossing lesion; treating lesion (lesion preparation; intervention; intervention optimization; bailout intervention; and treatment of non-target lesions); and closure of artery); and pharmacological interventions. Further refinements were made to the framework as a result of feedback from three focus groups and a Delphi questionnaire. The framework deconstructs an endovascular intervention into its component parts. The final framework can be accessed at www.endo-star.com. Pilot testing evaluated comprehension, clarity, and completeness of interpretation. Conclusion: The Endo-STAR framework deconstructs endovascular interventions into their key component parts and has been designed and pilot tested to enhance the quality of RCTs of endovascular interventions in peripheral arterial disease. It may be used to assist in developing future trial protocols, the standardization of infrainguinal endovascular interventions, the monitoring of adherence to the trial protocol, and as a standardized reporting guideline.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105003029795
U2 - 10.1093/bjs/znaf020
DO - 10.1093/bjs/znaf020
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105003029795
SN - 0007-1323
VL - 112
JO - British Journal of Surgery
JF - British Journal of Surgery
IS - 4
M1 - znaf020
ER -