TY - JOUR
T1 - Endovascular treatment of common iliac artery aneurysms with an iliac branch device
T2 - Multicenter experience of 140 patients
AU - Jongsma, Hidde
AU - Bekken, Joost A.
AU - Bekkers, Wouter J.J.
AU - Zeebregts, Clark J.
AU - Van Herwaarden, Joost
AU - Hoksbergen, Arjan
AU - Cuypers, Philip
AU - De Vries, Jean Paul P.M.
AU - Verhagen, Hence J.
AU - Fioole, Bram
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2016.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy, feasibility, and long-term outcomes of the Zenith ZBIS iliac branch device (IBD) to preserve internal iliac artery (IIA) perfusion in a large Dutch multicenter cohort. Methods: Between September 2004 and August 2015, 140 patients (mean age 70.9±7.4 years; 130 men) with 162 IBD implantations were identified in 7 vascular centers. The indication for IBD implantation was an abdominal aortic aneurysm <55 mm with a concomitant common iliac artery (CIA) aneurysm <20 mm (n=40), a CIA aneurysm with a diameter <30 mm (n=89), or revision of a type Ib endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair (n=11). Results: Technical success (aneurysm exclusion, no type I or III endoleak, and a patent IIA) was obtained in 157 (96.9%) of 162 IBD implantations. Six (4.3%) patients developed major complications; 2 (1.4%) died. Mean follow-up was 26.6±24.1 months, during which 17 (12.1%) IBD-associated secondary interventions were performed. Including technical failures and intentional IIA embolizations, 15 (9.3%) IIA branch occlusions were identified; buttock claudication developed in 6 of these patients. The freedom from secondary intervention estimate was 75.9% (95% confidence interval 59.7 to 86.3) at 5 years. Conclusion: CIA aneurysms can be treated safely and effectively by IBDs with preservation of antegrade flow to the IIA. Secondary interventions are indicated in <10% of patients during follow-up but can be performed endovascularly in most.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy, feasibility, and long-term outcomes of the Zenith ZBIS iliac branch device (IBD) to preserve internal iliac artery (IIA) perfusion in a large Dutch multicenter cohort. Methods: Between September 2004 and August 2015, 140 patients (mean age 70.9±7.4 years; 130 men) with 162 IBD implantations were identified in 7 vascular centers. The indication for IBD implantation was an abdominal aortic aneurysm <55 mm with a concomitant common iliac artery (CIA) aneurysm <20 mm (n=40), a CIA aneurysm with a diameter <30 mm (n=89), or revision of a type Ib endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair (n=11). Results: Technical success (aneurysm exclusion, no type I or III endoleak, and a patent IIA) was obtained in 157 (96.9%) of 162 IBD implantations. Six (4.3%) patients developed major complications; 2 (1.4%) died. Mean follow-up was 26.6±24.1 months, during which 17 (12.1%) IBD-associated secondary interventions were performed. Including technical failures and intentional IIA embolizations, 15 (9.3%) IIA branch occlusions were identified; buttock claudication developed in 6 of these patients. The freedom from secondary intervention estimate was 75.9% (95% confidence interval 59.7 to 86.3) at 5 years. Conclusion: CIA aneurysms can be treated safely and effectively by IBDs with preservation of antegrade flow to the IIA. Secondary interventions are indicated in <10% of patients during follow-up but can be performed endovascularly in most.
KW - abdominal aortic aneurysm
KW - branch occlusion
KW - branched stent-graft
KW - common iliac artery aneurysm
KW - complications
KW - endoleak
KW - endovascular aneurysm repair
KW - hypogastric artery
KW - iliac artery
KW - internal iliac artery
KW - mortality
KW - reintervention
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018248397&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1526602816679132
DO - 10.1177/1526602816679132
M3 - Article
C2 - 27864456
AN - SCOPUS:85018248397
SN - 1526-6028
VL - 24
SP - 239
EP - 245
JO - Journal of Endovascular Therapy
JF - Journal of Endovascular Therapy
IS - 2
ER -