TY - JOUR
T1 - Endovascular treatment in patients with renal dysfunction
T2 - results of the MR CLEAN Registry
AU - Vos, Erik M.
AU - Peeters-Scholte, Cacha M.P.C.D.
AU - den Hartog, Sanne J.
AU - Lingsma, Hester F.
AU - van Zwam, Wim H.
AU - van Oostenbrugge, Robert J.
AU - Uyttenboogaart, Maarten
AU - van Es, Adriaan C.G.M.
AU - Majoie, Charles L.M.
AU - van der Worp, Bart
AU - Coutinho, Jonathan M.
AU - Nederkoorn, Paul J.
AU - Kruyt, Nyika D.
AU - Dippel, Diederik W.J.
AU - Roozenbeek, Bob
AU - van den Wijngaard, Ido R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2026. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Stroke Organisation.
PY - 2026/4
Y1 - 2026/4
N2 - Introduction: It is unclear whether renal function is associated with outcome in patients with ischaemic stroke treated with EVT, as findings in existing literature have been inconsistent. We studied the association between renal function and outcomes in EVT-treated patients. Patients and methods: We used data from the Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands (MR CLEAN) Registry. We assessed the association between renal function using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and functional outcome measured with the mRS score, mortality and the occurrence of sICH in ischaemic stroke patients treated with EVT. We used ordinal regression modelling to estimate common odds ratios (cOR) per 10-unit decrease in eGFR, adjusted for known prognostic factors. Results: We analysed 4466 patients included between March 2014 and December 2018. Patients with lower eGFR were older, had more severe strokes at baseline, more comorbidities and higher pre-stroke mRS scores (all P < .001). In unadjusted analyses, higher eGFR was associated with better 3-month functional outcome (cOR 1.18; 95% CI, 1.15–1.21) and lower mortality (cOR 0.81; 95% CI, 0.78–0.83). After adjusting for demographic factors, only the association between eGFR and mortality remained significant. After further adjustment for medical history and comorbidities, no association was found between eGFR and mRS (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.99; 95% CI, 0.96–1.02) or mortality (aOR 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93–1.01). There was no association between eGFR and sICH (cOR 0.95; 95%CI, 0.89–1.01, aOR 0.99; 95% CI, 0.93–1.06). Conclusion: Renal function was not an independent modifier of outcome after EVT for ischaemic stroke although eGFR may serve as a predictor of increased risk of disability and mortality. Based on these results, renal function alone should not determine eligibility for EVT in ischaemic stroke patients.
AB - Introduction: It is unclear whether renal function is associated with outcome in patients with ischaemic stroke treated with EVT, as findings in existing literature have been inconsistent. We studied the association between renal function and outcomes in EVT-treated patients. Patients and methods: We used data from the Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands (MR CLEAN) Registry. We assessed the association between renal function using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and functional outcome measured with the mRS score, mortality and the occurrence of sICH in ischaemic stroke patients treated with EVT. We used ordinal regression modelling to estimate common odds ratios (cOR) per 10-unit decrease in eGFR, adjusted for known prognostic factors. Results: We analysed 4466 patients included between March 2014 and December 2018. Patients with lower eGFR were older, had more severe strokes at baseline, more comorbidities and higher pre-stroke mRS scores (all P < .001). In unadjusted analyses, higher eGFR was associated with better 3-month functional outcome (cOR 1.18; 95% CI, 1.15–1.21) and lower mortality (cOR 0.81; 95% CI, 0.78–0.83). After adjusting for demographic factors, only the association between eGFR and mortality remained significant. After further adjustment for medical history and comorbidities, no association was found between eGFR and mRS (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.99; 95% CI, 0.96–1.02) or mortality (aOR 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93–1.01). There was no association between eGFR and sICH (cOR 0.95; 95%CI, 0.89–1.01, aOR 0.99; 95% CI, 0.93–1.06). Conclusion: Renal function was not an independent modifier of outcome after EVT for ischaemic stroke although eGFR may serve as a predictor of increased risk of disability and mortality. Based on these results, renal function alone should not determine eligibility for EVT in ischaemic stroke patients.
KW - endovascular therapy
KW - ischaemic stroke
KW - treatment
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105036797809
U2 - 10.1093/esj/aakag038
DO - 10.1093/esj/aakag038
M3 - Article
C2 - 42024492
AN - SCOPUS:105036797809
SN - 2396-9873
VL - 11
JO - European Stroke Journal
JF - European Stroke Journal
IS - 4
M1 - aakag038
ER -