TY - JOUR
T1 - Electrocardiographic Features of Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
T2 - A Systematic Review
AU - Van Ommen, Anne-Mar
AU - Kessler, Elise Laura
AU - Valstar, Gideon
AU - Onland-Moret, N Charlotte
AU - Cramer, Maarten Jan
AU - Rutten, Frans
AU - Coronel, Ruben
AU - Den Ruijter, Hester
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2021 Van Ommen, Kessler, Valstar, Onland-Moret, Cramer, Rutten, Coronel and Den Ruijter.
PY - 2021/12/17
Y1 - 2021/12/17
N2 - Background: Electrocardiographic features are well-known for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but not for left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). As ECG features could help to identify high-risk individuals in primary care, we systematically reviewed the literature for ECG features diagnosing women and men suspected of LVDD and HFpEF. Methods and Results: Among the 7,127 records identified, only 10 studies reported diagnostic measures, of which 9 studied LVDD. For LVDD, the most promising features were T-end-P/(PQ*age), which is the electrocardiographic equivalent of the passive-to-active filling (AUC: 0.91-0.96), and repolarization times (QTc interval ≥ 350 ms, AUC: 0.85). For HFpEF, the Cornell product ≥ 1,800 mm*ms showed poor sensitivity of 40% (AUC: 0.62). No studies presented results stratified by sex. Conclusion: Electrocardiographic features are not widely evaluated in diagnostic studies for LVDD and HFpEF. Only for LVDD, two ECG features related to the diastolic interval, and repolarization measures showed diagnostic potential. To improve diagnosis and care for women and men suspected of heart failure, reporting of sex-specific data on ECG features is encouraged.
AB - Background: Electrocardiographic features are well-known for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but not for left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). As ECG features could help to identify high-risk individuals in primary care, we systematically reviewed the literature for ECG features diagnosing women and men suspected of LVDD and HFpEF. Methods and Results: Among the 7,127 records identified, only 10 studies reported diagnostic measures, of which 9 studied LVDD. For LVDD, the most promising features were T-end-P/(PQ*age), which is the electrocardiographic equivalent of the passive-to-active filling (AUC: 0.91-0.96), and repolarization times (QTc interval ≥ 350 ms, AUC: 0.85). For HFpEF, the Cornell product ≥ 1,800 mm*ms showed poor sensitivity of 40% (AUC: 0.62). No studies presented results stratified by sex. Conclusion: Electrocardiographic features are not widely evaluated in diagnostic studies for LVDD and HFpEF. Only for LVDD, two ECG features related to the diastolic interval, and repolarization measures showed diagnostic potential. To improve diagnosis and care for women and men suspected of heart failure, reporting of sex-specific data on ECG features is encouraged.
KW - HFpEF-heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
KW - LVDD-left ventricular diastolic dysfunction
KW - diagnosis
KW - electrocardiography (ECG)
KW - primary care
KW - sex-differences
U2 - 10.3389/fcvm.2021.772803
DO - 10.3389/fcvm.2021.772803
M3 - Article
C2 - 34977187
SN - 2297-055X
VL - 8
SP - 1
EP - 11
JO - Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine
JF - Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine
M1 - 772803
ER -