TY - JOUR
T1 - Electrocardiogram-gated cardiac computed tomography-based patient- and segment-specific cardiac motion estimation method in stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation for ventricular tachycardia
AU - Xie, Jingyang
AU - Bicu, Alicia S.
AU - Grehn, Melanie
AU - Kuru, Mustafa
AU - Zaman, Adrian
AU - Lu, Xinyu
AU - Janorschke, Christian
AU - van der Pol, Luuk H.G.
AU - Fast, Martin F.
AU - Fleckenstein, Jens
AU - Both, Marcus
AU - Hohmann, Stephan
AU - Borzov, Egor
AU - Winkler, Peter
AU - Tilz, Roland R.
AU - Rades, Dirk
AU - Giordano, Frank A.
AU - Buergy, Daniel
AU - Rudic, Boris
AU - Duncker, David
AU - Merten, Roland
AU - Charas, Tomer
AU - Suleiman, Mahmoud
AU - Brunner, Thomas
AU - Scherr, Daniel
AU - Lian, Evgeny
AU - Schweikard, Achim
AU - Blanck, Oliver
AU - Boda-Heggemann, Judit
AU - Kaestner, Lena
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s)
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - Background and purpose: Motion management strategies such as gating under breath-hold can reduce breathing-induced motion during stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) for refractory ventricular tachycardia. However, heartbeat-induced motion is essential to define an appropriate cardiac internal target volume (ITV) margin. In this study, we introduce a patient- and segment-specific cardiac motion estimation method and cardiac motion data of the clinical target volume (CTV), ICD lead tips and left ventricle (LV) segments. Materials and methods: Data from 10 STAR-treated patients were retrospectively analyzed. The LV was semi-automatically segmented according to the 17-segment model. Electrocardiogram-gated contrast-enhanced breath-hold cardiac CTs were automatically non-rigidly registered for motion estimation. The correlation and significant differences between ICD tip motion and CTV motion were assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) and Wilcoxon signed-rank test, while spatial discrepancies with both CTV and segment motion were quantified using the Euclidean distance. Results: The CTVs (center of mass) moved 3.4 ± 1.4 mm and the ICD lead tips moved 4.9 ± 2.2 mm. The maximum motion per patient was observed in basal and mid-cavity LV segments in 3D. The PCC showed a strong positive motion correlation between the ICD tip and CTV in 3D (0.84), while the p-values indicated statistically significant differences in the right-left, anterior-posterior and 3D directions. Conclusion: The proposed methods enable patient- and segment-specific cardiac ITV margin estimation. The motion in most LV segments was limited, however, cardiac ITV margins may need adjustment in individual cases. The impact of cardiac motion on the dosimetry needs further investigation.
AB - Background and purpose: Motion management strategies such as gating under breath-hold can reduce breathing-induced motion during stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) for refractory ventricular tachycardia. However, heartbeat-induced motion is essential to define an appropriate cardiac internal target volume (ITV) margin. In this study, we introduce a patient- and segment-specific cardiac motion estimation method and cardiac motion data of the clinical target volume (CTV), ICD lead tips and left ventricle (LV) segments. Materials and methods: Data from 10 STAR-treated patients were retrospectively analyzed. The LV was semi-automatically segmented according to the 17-segment model. Electrocardiogram-gated contrast-enhanced breath-hold cardiac CTs were automatically non-rigidly registered for motion estimation. The correlation and significant differences between ICD tip motion and CTV motion were assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) and Wilcoxon signed-rank test, while spatial discrepancies with both CTV and segment motion were quantified using the Euclidean distance. Results: The CTVs (center of mass) moved 3.4 ± 1.4 mm and the ICD lead tips moved 4.9 ± 2.2 mm. The maximum motion per patient was observed in basal and mid-cavity LV segments in 3D. The PCC showed a strong positive motion correlation between the ICD tip and CTV in 3D (0.84), while the p-values indicated statistically significant differences in the right-left, anterior-posterior and 3D directions. Conclusion: The proposed methods enable patient- and segment-specific cardiac ITV margin estimation. The motion in most LV segments was limited, however, cardiac ITV margins may need adjustment in individual cases. The impact of cardiac motion on the dosimetry needs further investigation.
KW - AHA 17-segment model
KW - Cardiac ITV margin estimation
KW - Cardiac motion estimation
KW - ICD lead tip motion
KW - Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation
KW - Ventricular tachycardia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85215600977&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.phro.2025.100700
DO - 10.1016/j.phro.2025.100700
M3 - Article
C2 - 39911878
AN - SCOPUS:85215600977
SN - 2405-6316
VL - 33
JO - Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
JF - Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
M1 - 100700
ER -