TY - JOUR
T1 - Electrocardiogram-based deep learning improves outcome prediction following cardiac resynchronization therapy
AU - Wouters, Philippe C.
AU - van de Leur, Rutger R.
AU - Vessies, Melle B.
AU - van Stipdonk, Antonius M.W.
AU - Ghossein, Mohammed A.
AU - Hassink, Rutger J.
AU - Doevendans, Pieter A.
AU - van der Harst, Pim
AU - Maass, Alexander H.
AU - Prinzen, Frits W.
AU - Vernooy, Kevin
AU - Meine, Mathias
AU - van Es, René
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Dutch Heart Foundation and co-financed by The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development [ZonMw, no. 104021004] and the Dutch Heart Foundation [no. 2019B011] and performed within the framework of the Centre for Translational Molecular Medicine (www.ctmm.nl), project COHFAR [Congestive Heart Failure and Arrhythmias, grant 01C-203].
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
PY - 2023/2/21
Y1 - 2023/2/21
N2 - Aims This study aims to identify and visualize electrocardiogram (ECG) features using an explainable deep learning–based algorithm to predict cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) outcome. Its performance is compared with current guideline ECG criteria and QRSAREA. Methods A deep learning algorithm, trained on 1.1 million ECGs from 251 473 patients, was used to compress the median beat ECG, and results thereby summarizing most ECG features into only 21 explainable factors (FactorECG). Pre-implantation ECGs of 1306 CRT patients from three academic centres were converted into their respective FactorECG. FactorECG predicted the combined clinical endpoint of death, left ventricular assist device, or heart transplantation [c-statistic 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66–0.72], significantly outperforming QRSAREA and guideline ECG criteria [c-statistic 0.61 (95% CI 0.58–0.64) and 0.57 (95% CI 0.54–0.60), P< 0.001 for both]. The addition of 13 clinical variables was of limited added value for the FactorECG model when compared with QRSAREA (Δ c-statistic 0.03 vs. 0.10). FactorECG identified inferolateral T-wave inversion, smaller right precordial S- and T-wave amplitude, ventricular rate, and increased PR interval and P-wave duration to be important predictors for poor outcome. An online visualization tool was created to provide interactive visualizations (https://crt.ecgx.ai). Conclusion Requiring only a standard 12-lead ECG, FactorECG held superior discriminative ability for the prediction of clinical outcome when compared with guideline criteria and QRSAREA, without requiring additional clinical variables. End-to-end automated visualization of ECG features allows for an explainable algorithm, which may facilitate rapid uptake of this personalized decision-making tool in CRT.
AB - Aims This study aims to identify and visualize electrocardiogram (ECG) features using an explainable deep learning–based algorithm to predict cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) outcome. Its performance is compared with current guideline ECG criteria and QRSAREA. Methods A deep learning algorithm, trained on 1.1 million ECGs from 251 473 patients, was used to compress the median beat ECG, and results thereby summarizing most ECG features into only 21 explainable factors (FactorECG). Pre-implantation ECGs of 1306 CRT patients from three academic centres were converted into their respective FactorECG. FactorECG predicted the combined clinical endpoint of death, left ventricular assist device, or heart transplantation [c-statistic 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66–0.72], significantly outperforming QRSAREA and guideline ECG criteria [c-statistic 0.61 (95% CI 0.58–0.64) and 0.57 (95% CI 0.54–0.60), P< 0.001 for both]. The addition of 13 clinical variables was of limited added value for the FactorECG model when compared with QRSAREA (Δ c-statistic 0.03 vs. 0.10). FactorECG identified inferolateral T-wave inversion, smaller right precordial S- and T-wave amplitude, ventricular rate, and increased PR interval and P-wave duration to be important predictors for poor outcome. An online visualization tool was created to provide interactive visualizations (https://crt.ecgx.ai). Conclusion Requiring only a standard 12-lead ECG, FactorECG held superior discriminative ability for the prediction of clinical outcome when compared with guideline criteria and QRSAREA, without requiring additional clinical variables. End-to-end automated visualization of ECG features allows for an explainable algorithm, which may facilitate rapid uptake of this personalized decision-making tool in CRT.
KW - Cardiac resynchronization therapy
KW - Deep learning
KW - Electrocardiogram
KW - Explainable
KW - Heart failure
KW - QRS area
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85154616926&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac617
DO - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac617
M3 - Article
C2 - 36342291
SN - 0195-668X
VL - 44
SP - 680
EP - 692
JO - European heart journal
JF - European heart journal
IS - 8
ER -