TY - JOUR
T1 - Elective Ascending Aortic Aneurysm Surgery in the Elderly
AU - Memis, Feyza
AU - Thijssen, Carlijn G.E.
AU - Gökalp, Arjen L.
AU - Notenboom, Maximiliaan L.
AU - Meccanici, Frederike
AU - Mokhles, Mohammad Mostafa
AU - van Kimmenade, Roland R.J.
AU - Veen, Kevin M.
AU - Geuzebroek, Guillaume S.C.
AU - Sjatskig, Jelena
AU - ter Woorst, Franciscus J.
AU - Bekkers, Jos A.
AU - Takkenberg, Johanna J.M.
AU - Roos-Hesselink, Jolien W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by the authors.
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - Background. No clear guidelines exist for performing preventive surgery for ascending aortic (AA) aneurysm in elderly patients. This study aims to provide insights by: (1) evaluating patient and procedural characteristics and (2) comparing early outcomes and long-term mortality after surgery between elderly and non-elderly patients. Methods. A multicenter retrospective observational cohort-study was performed. Data was collected on patients who underwent elective AA surgery in three institutions (2006–2017). Clinical presentation, outcomes, and mortality were compared between elderly (≥70 years) and non-elderly patients. Results. In total, 724 non-elderly and 231 elderly patients were operated upon. Elderly patients had larger aortic diameters (57.0 mm (IQR 53–63) vs. 53.0 mm (IQR 49–58), p < 0.001) and more cardiovascular risk factors at the time of surgery than non-elderly patients. Elderly females had significantly larger aortic diameters than elderly males (59.5 mm (55–65) vs. 56.0 mm (51–60), p < 0.001). Short-term mortality was comparable between elderly and non-elderly patients (3.0% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.16). Five-year survival was 93.9% in non-elderly patients and 81.4% in elderly patients (p < 0.001), which are both lower than that of the age-matched general Dutch population. Conclusion. This study showed that in elderly patients, a higher threshold exists to undergo surgery, especially in elderly females. Despite these differences, short-term outcomes were comparable between ‘relatively healthy’ elderly and non-elderly patients.
AB - Background. No clear guidelines exist for performing preventive surgery for ascending aortic (AA) aneurysm in elderly patients. This study aims to provide insights by: (1) evaluating patient and procedural characteristics and (2) comparing early outcomes and long-term mortality after surgery between elderly and non-elderly patients. Methods. A multicenter retrospective observational cohort-study was performed. Data was collected on patients who underwent elective AA surgery in three institutions (2006–2017). Clinical presentation, outcomes, and mortality were compared between elderly (≥70 years) and non-elderly patients. Results. In total, 724 non-elderly and 231 elderly patients were operated upon. Elderly patients had larger aortic diameters (57.0 mm (IQR 53–63) vs. 53.0 mm (IQR 49–58), p < 0.001) and more cardiovascular risk factors at the time of surgery than non-elderly patients. Elderly females had significantly larger aortic diameters than elderly males (59.5 mm (55–65) vs. 56.0 mm (51–60), p < 0.001). Short-term mortality was comparable between elderly and non-elderly patients (3.0% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.16). Five-year survival was 93.9% in non-elderly patients and 81.4% in elderly patients (p < 0.001), which are both lower than that of the age-matched general Dutch population. Conclusion. This study showed that in elderly patients, a higher threshold exists to undergo surgery, especially in elderly females. Despite these differences, short-term outcomes were comparable between ‘relatively healthy’ elderly and non-elderly patients.
KW - aortic aneurysm
KW - aortic root
KW - aortic surgery
KW - ascending aorta
KW - elderly
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85149846120&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/jcm12052015
DO - 10.3390/jcm12052015
M3 - Article
C2 - 36902802
AN - SCOPUS:85149846120
SN - 2077-0383
VL - 12
JO - Journal of Clinical medicine
JF - Journal of Clinical medicine
IS - 5
M1 - 2015
ER -