TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy of phage therapy in preclinical models of bacterial infection
T2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Gómez-Ochoa, Sergio Alejandro
AU - Pitton, Melissa
AU - Valente, Luca G.
AU - Sosa Vesga, Cristian David
AU - Largo, Jorge
AU - Quiroga-Centeno, Andrea Carolina
AU - Hernández Vargas, Juliana Alexandra
AU - Trujillo-Cáceres, Silvia Juliana
AU - Muka, Taulant
AU - Cameron, David R.
AU - Que, Yok Ai
N1 - Funding Information:
Y-AQ. was supported by the Swiss National Foundation (320030_176216 and CR31I3_166124). DRC was supported by the Swiss Heart Foundation (FF20114). We want to thank Christa Niehot for her support in performing the systematic literature searches.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - Background: Antimicrobial resistance of bacterial pathogens is an increasing clinical problem and alternative approaches to antibiotic chemotherapy are needed. One of these approaches is the use of lytic bacterial viruses known as phage therapy. We aimed to assess the efficacy of phage therapy in preclinical animal models of bacterial infection. Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, MEDLINE/Ovid, Embase/Ovid, CINAHL/EbscoHOST, Web of Science/Wiley, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to Sept 30, 2021. Studies assessing phage efficacy in animal models were included. Only studies that assessed the efficacy of phage therapy in treating established bacterial infections in terms of survival and bacterial abundance or density were included. Studies reporting only in-vitro or ex-vivo results and those with incomplete information were excluded. Risk-of-bias assessment was performed using the Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation tool. The main endpoints were animal survival and tissue bacterial burden, which were reported using pooled odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences with random-effects models. The I2 measure and its 95% CI were also calculated. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022311309. Findings: Of the 5084 references screened, 124 studies fulfilled the selection criteria. Risk of bias was high for 70 (56%) of the 124 included studies; therefore, only studies classified as having a low-to-moderate risk of bias were considered for quantitative data synthesis (n=32). Phage therapy was associated with significantly improved survival at 24 h in systemic infection models (OR 0·08 [95% CI 0·03 to 0·20]; I2=55% [95% CI 8 to 77]), skin infection (OR 0·08 [0·04 to 0·19]; I2 = 0% [0 to 79]), and pneumonia models (OR 0·13 [0·06 to 0·31]; I2=0% [0 to 68]) when compared with placebo. Animals with skin infections (mean difference –2·66 [95% CI –3·17 to –2·16]; I2 = 95% [90 to 96]) and those with pneumonia (mean difference –3·35 [–6·00 to –0·69]; I2 = 99% [98 to 99]) treated with phage therapy had significantly lower tissue bacterial loads at 5 ± 2 days of follow-up compared with placebo. Interpretation: Phage therapy significantly improved animal survival and reduced organ bacterial loads compared with placebo in preclinical animal models. However, high heterogeneity was observed in some comparisons. More evidence is needed to identify the factors influencing phage therapy performance to improve future clinical application. Funding: Swiss National Foundation and Swiss Heart Foundation.
AB - Background: Antimicrobial resistance of bacterial pathogens is an increasing clinical problem and alternative approaches to antibiotic chemotherapy are needed. One of these approaches is the use of lytic bacterial viruses known as phage therapy. We aimed to assess the efficacy of phage therapy in preclinical animal models of bacterial infection. Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, MEDLINE/Ovid, Embase/Ovid, CINAHL/EbscoHOST, Web of Science/Wiley, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to Sept 30, 2021. Studies assessing phage efficacy in animal models were included. Only studies that assessed the efficacy of phage therapy in treating established bacterial infections in terms of survival and bacterial abundance or density were included. Studies reporting only in-vitro or ex-vivo results and those with incomplete information were excluded. Risk-of-bias assessment was performed using the Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation tool. The main endpoints were animal survival and tissue bacterial burden, which were reported using pooled odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences with random-effects models. The I2 measure and its 95% CI were also calculated. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022311309. Findings: Of the 5084 references screened, 124 studies fulfilled the selection criteria. Risk of bias was high for 70 (56%) of the 124 included studies; therefore, only studies classified as having a low-to-moderate risk of bias were considered for quantitative data synthesis (n=32). Phage therapy was associated with significantly improved survival at 24 h in systemic infection models (OR 0·08 [95% CI 0·03 to 0·20]; I2=55% [95% CI 8 to 77]), skin infection (OR 0·08 [0·04 to 0·19]; I2 = 0% [0 to 79]), and pneumonia models (OR 0·13 [0·06 to 0·31]; I2=0% [0 to 68]) when compared with placebo. Animals with skin infections (mean difference –2·66 [95% CI –3·17 to –2·16]; I2 = 95% [90 to 96]) and those with pneumonia (mean difference –3·35 [–6·00 to –0·69]; I2 = 99% [98 to 99]) treated with phage therapy had significantly lower tissue bacterial loads at 5 ± 2 days of follow-up compared with placebo. Interpretation: Phage therapy significantly improved animal survival and reduced organ bacterial loads compared with placebo in preclinical animal models. However, high heterogeneity was observed in some comparisons. More evidence is needed to identify the factors influencing phage therapy performance to improve future clinical application. Funding: Swiss National Foundation and Swiss Heart Foundation.
KW - Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use
KW - Bacterial Infections/therapy
KW - Humans
KW - Phage Therapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85145823268&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S2666-5247(22)00288-9
DO - 10.1016/S2666-5247(22)00288-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 36370748
SN - 2666-5247
VL - 3
SP - e956-e968
JO - The Lancet. Microbe
JF - The Lancet. Microbe
IS - 12
ER -