TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy and safety of recombinant E. coli asparaginase in children with previously untreated acute lymphoblastic leukemia
T2 - A randomized multicenter study of the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group
AU - van der Sluis, Inge M.
AU - de Groot-Kruseman, Hester
AU - te Loo, Maroeska
AU - Tissing, Wim J.E.
AU - van den Bos, Cor
AU - Kaspers, Gertjan J.L.
AU - Bierings, Marc
AU - Kollen, Wouter J.W.
AU - König, Thorsten
AU - Pichlmeier, Uwe
AU - Kühnel, Hans Jürgen
AU - Pieters, Rob
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by a grant from medac GmbH (Wedel, Germany), the sponsor of this clinical protocol. The authors would like to thank CRS Clinical Research Services Mannheim GmbH, Grün-stadt, Germany for the measurement and analysis of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data.
Funding Information:
informationGrant sponsor: medac GmbHThis work was supported by a grant from medac GmbH (Wedel, Germany), the sponsor of this clinical protocol. The authors would like to thank CRS Clinical Research Services Mannheim GmbH, Gr?nstadt, Germany for the measurement and analysis of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic data.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2018/8/1
Y1 - 2018/8/1
N2 - Background: The efficacy and safety of recombinant Escherichia coli–asparaginase (rASNase) was compared to native E.coli asparaginase (Asparaginase medac). Methods: One hundred and ninety-nine children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia were randomized to receive one of both agents at a dose of 5,000 U/m² during induction (eight doses) and 10,000 U/m² during the postinduction phase (only high-risk patients; standard- and medium-risk patients received pegaspargase). Results: Median trough serum asparaginase activity levels were comparable between both groups; they ranged from 143 to 182 U/l during induction and were above the target value of 100 U/l. Complete asparagine depletion in serum was achieved in 97.9% of patients, with no significant differences between both groups. On day 33 (end of induction), only two (2%) evaluable patients in each group had measurable asparagine serum levels, and complete asparagine depletion in the cerebrospinal fluid was achieved in 98.8% and 93.6% of the patients with rASNase and Asparaginase medac, respectively. During induction, 2.1% and 5% of patients developed an allergic reaction to rASNase or Asparaginase medac, respectively. Approximately 41% of the patients in both groups had a clinical allergy or enzyme inactivation to the first dose of any asparaginase preparation in postinduction. A comparable proportion of patients in both groups developed anti-asparaginase antibodies (57%) during repeated administration of asparaginase. Minimal residual disease levels at the end of induction, 5-year event-free survival, and 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse did not differ between both groups. Conclusion: The efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of both asparaginase preparations are comparable. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00784017; EudraCT number 2006-003180-31.
AB - Background: The efficacy and safety of recombinant Escherichia coli–asparaginase (rASNase) was compared to native E.coli asparaginase (Asparaginase medac). Methods: One hundred and ninety-nine children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia were randomized to receive one of both agents at a dose of 5,000 U/m² during induction (eight doses) and 10,000 U/m² during the postinduction phase (only high-risk patients; standard- and medium-risk patients received pegaspargase). Results: Median trough serum asparaginase activity levels were comparable between both groups; they ranged from 143 to 182 U/l during induction and were above the target value of 100 U/l. Complete asparagine depletion in serum was achieved in 97.9% of patients, with no significant differences between both groups. On day 33 (end of induction), only two (2%) evaluable patients in each group had measurable asparagine serum levels, and complete asparagine depletion in the cerebrospinal fluid was achieved in 98.8% and 93.6% of the patients with rASNase and Asparaginase medac, respectively. During induction, 2.1% and 5% of patients developed an allergic reaction to rASNase or Asparaginase medac, respectively. Approximately 41% of the patients in both groups had a clinical allergy or enzyme inactivation to the first dose of any asparaginase preparation in postinduction. A comparable proportion of patients in both groups developed anti-asparaginase antibodies (57%) during repeated administration of asparaginase. Minimal residual disease levels at the end of induction, 5-year event-free survival, and 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse did not differ between both groups. Conclusion: The efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of both asparaginase preparations are comparable. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00784017; EudraCT number 2006-003180-31.
KW - efficacy
KW - pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia
KW - randomized trial
KW - recombinant asparaginase
KW - toxicity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046358625&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/pbc.27083
DO - 10.1002/pbc.27083
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85046358625
SN - 1545-5009
VL - 65
JO - Pediatric Blood and Cancer
JF - Pediatric Blood and Cancer
M1 - e27083
ER -