Effectiviteit van Triple P in Nederland: stand van zaken en controverse

Translated title of the contribution: Effectiveness of Triple P in the Netherlands: state of affairs and controversy

R Schappin, Ireen de Graaf, S.A. Reijneveld

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleProfessional

Abstract

Objective: The Triple P – Positive Parenting Program is available in over 50% of the Dutch municipalities. In this article we summarize the effects of Triple P as found in international meta-analyses and Dutch research. We also discuss the controversy surrounding Triple P.
Method: We systematically discuss international meta-analyses and Dutch studies
with a control group.
Results: According to international research, the effect of Triple P on child behavioural problems and parenting skills is greater than that of care-as-usual. In the Netherlands, Triple P levels 3 and 4 are not more effective than care-as-usual; other levels of Triple P have not been studied.
Discussion: Conflict of interest among the developers of Triple P appears to influence the results of international research on Triple P in which they are often
involved. Dutch research is performed independently of Triple P developers except for one study) and finds that Triple P is not more effective than care-as-usual.
Translated title of the contributionEffectiveness of Triple P in the Netherlands: state of affairs and controversy
Original languageDutch
Pages (from-to)75-90
JournalKind en Adolescent
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2017

Keywords

  • Triple P
  • opvoedinterventie
  • effectiviteit

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of Triple P in the Netherlands: state of affairs and controversy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this