Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the effectiveness of remission induction strategies compared to single csDMARD-initiating strategies according to current guidelines in early RA.
RECENT FINDINGS: Twenty-nine studies, heterogeneous on, e.g., specific treatment strategy and remission outcome used, were identified. Using DAS28-remission over 12 months, 13 (76%) of 17 remission induction strategies showed significantly more patients achieving remission. Pooled relative "risk" was 1.73 [95%CI 1.59-1.88] for bDMARD-based remission induction strategies and 1.20 [95%CI 1.03-1.40] for combination csDMARD-based remission induction strategies compared to single csDMARD-initiating strategies. When additional glucocorticoid "bridging therapy" was used in single csDMARD-initiating strategies, the higher proportion patients achieving remission in remission induction strategies was no longer statistically significant (pooled RR 1.06 [95%CI 0.83-1.35]). For other remission outcomes, results were in line with above. Remission induction strategies are more effective in achieving remission compared to single csDMARD-initiating strategies, possibly more so in bDMARD-based induction strategies. However, compared to single csDMARD-initiating strategies with glucocorticoids, induction strategies may not be more effective.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 24 |
Journal | Current Rheumatology Reports |
Volume | 21 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 23 Apr 2019 |
Keywords
- bDMARDs
- csDMARDs
- Early rheumatoid arthritis
- GCs
- Induction therapy
- Standard care