TY - JOUR
T1 - Effectiveness of diabetes self-management education and support via a smartphone application in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes
T2 - Results of a randomized controlled trial (TRIGGER study)
AU - Boels, Anne Meike
AU - Vos, Rimke C.
AU - Dijkhorst-Oei, Lioe Ting
AU - Rutten, Guy E.H.M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding The study was funded by Sanofi-Aventis.
Funding Information:
people with type 2 diabetes from general practices and outpatient hospital clinics for participating in the study. The authors also thank Maria Schipper (Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department of Biostatistics and Research Support, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands) for her statistical support, and Ivonne Sluijs (Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department of Cardiovascular Epidemiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands) for her advice regarding the food frequency questionnaire. We acknowledge the help of Ron van Leeuwen, Paul van den Bogaert, Adrienne Weinberg, Sijda Groen, Nicolien van der Hart and Martine Dogger for reviewing the content of the app messages. We thank Curavista for programming the software for the smartphone app for this study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Author(s).
PY - 2019/12/30
Y1 - 2019/12/30
N2 - Objective: To investigate the effect of diabetes self-management education and support via a smartphone app in individuals with type 2 diabetes on insulin therapy. Research design and methods: Open two-arm multicenter parallel randomized controlled superiority trial. The intervention group (n=115) received theory and evidence-based self-management education and support via a smartphone app (optionally two or six times per week, once daily at different times). The control group (n=115) received care as usual. Primary outcome: HbA1c at 6 months. Other outcomes included HbA1c ≤53 mmol/mol (≤7%) without any hypoglycemic event, body mass index, glycemic variability, dietary habits and quality of life. We performed multiple imputation and regression models adjusted for baseline value, age, sex, diabetes duration and insulin dose. Results: Sixty-six general practices and five hospital outpatient clinics recruited 230 participants. Baseline HbA1c was comparable between groups (8.1% and 8.3%, respectively). At 6 months, the HbA1c was 63.8 mmol/mol (8.0%) in the intervention vs 66.2 mmol/mol (8.2%) in the control group; adjusted difference -0.93 mmol/mol (-0.08%), 95% CI -4.02 to 2.17 mmol/mol (-0.37% to 0.20%), p=0.557. The odds for achieving an HbA1c level ≤7% without any hypoglycemic event was lower in the intervention group: OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.33 to 2.35. There was no effect on secondary outcomes. No adverse events were reported. Conclusions: This smartphone app providing diabetes self-management education and support had small and clinically not relevant effects. Apps should be more personalized and target individuals who think the app will be useful for them.
AB - Objective: To investigate the effect of diabetes self-management education and support via a smartphone app in individuals with type 2 diabetes on insulin therapy. Research design and methods: Open two-arm multicenter parallel randomized controlled superiority trial. The intervention group (n=115) received theory and evidence-based self-management education and support via a smartphone app (optionally two or six times per week, once daily at different times). The control group (n=115) received care as usual. Primary outcome: HbA1c at 6 months. Other outcomes included HbA1c ≤53 mmol/mol (≤7%) without any hypoglycemic event, body mass index, glycemic variability, dietary habits and quality of life. We performed multiple imputation and regression models adjusted for baseline value, age, sex, diabetes duration and insulin dose. Results: Sixty-six general practices and five hospital outpatient clinics recruited 230 participants. Baseline HbA1c was comparable between groups (8.1% and 8.3%, respectively). At 6 months, the HbA1c was 63.8 mmol/mol (8.0%) in the intervention vs 66.2 mmol/mol (8.2%) in the control group; adjusted difference -0.93 mmol/mol (-0.08%), 95% CI -4.02 to 2.17 mmol/mol (-0.37% to 0.20%), p=0.557. The odds for achieving an HbA1c level ≤7% without any hypoglycemic event was lower in the intervention group: OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.33 to 2.35. There was no effect on secondary outcomes. No adverse events were reported. Conclusions: This smartphone app providing diabetes self-management education and support had small and clinically not relevant effects. Apps should be more personalized and target individuals who think the app will be useful for them.
KW - insulin
KW - type 2 diabetes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077604147&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000981
DO - 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000981
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85077604147
VL - 7
JO - BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care
JF - BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care
IS - 1
M1 - e000981
ER -