TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of training general practitioners in drug treatment of newly detected heart failure patients with reduced or preserved ejection fraction
T2 - A cluster randomized trial
AU - Van Riet, Evelien E S
AU - Hoes, Arno W.
AU - Limburg, Alexander
AU - Landman, Marcel A J
AU - Zuithoff, NPA
AU - Rutten, Frans H.
PY - 2016/8/15
Y1 - 2016/8/15
N2 - Objective To assess the effect of training general practitioners (GPS) in the optimization of drug treatment for newly detected heart failure (HF). Design Cluster randomized trial comparing the training programme to care as usual. Participants Community-dwelling older persons with a new HF diagnosis after diagnostic work-up. Methods Thirty GPS were randomized to care as usual or the training. Sixteen GPS of the latter group received a half-day training on optimizing HF medication in HF patients with a reduced (HFrEF), or with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). At baseline and after six months of follow-up, the 46 HF patients in the intervention group and the 46 cases in the care as usual group were assessed on medication use, functionality, health status, and health care visits. Results After 6 months, uptake of HF medication and health status were similar in the two groups. Interestingly, patients in the intervention group had a longer walking distance with the six-minute walk test than those in the care as usual group (mean difference in all-type HF 28.0 (95% CI 2.9 to 53.1) meters; HFpEF patients 28.2 (95% CI 8.8 to 47.5) meters and HFrEF patients 55.9 (95% CI - 16.3 to 128.1) meters). They also had more HF-related GP visits (RR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.5) and fewer visits to the cardiologist (RR 0.6, 95% CI 0.3 to 1.1). Conclusions Training GPS in optimization of drug treatment of newly detected HFrEF and HFpEF did not clearly increase HF medication, but resulted in improvement in walking distance.
AB - Objective To assess the effect of training general practitioners (GPS) in the optimization of drug treatment for newly detected heart failure (HF). Design Cluster randomized trial comparing the training programme to care as usual. Participants Community-dwelling older persons with a new HF diagnosis after diagnostic work-up. Methods Thirty GPS were randomized to care as usual or the training. Sixteen GPS of the latter group received a half-day training on optimizing HF medication in HF patients with a reduced (HFrEF), or with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). At baseline and after six months of follow-up, the 46 HF patients in the intervention group and the 46 cases in the care as usual group were assessed on medication use, functionality, health status, and health care visits. Results After 6 months, uptake of HF medication and health status were similar in the two groups. Interestingly, patients in the intervention group had a longer walking distance with the six-minute walk test than those in the care as usual group (mean difference in all-type HF 28.0 (95% CI 2.9 to 53.1) meters; HFpEF patients 28.2 (95% CI 8.8 to 47.5) meters and HFrEF patients 55.9 (95% CI - 16.3 to 128.1) meters). They also had more HF-related GP visits (RR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.5) and fewer visits to the cardiologist (RR 0.6, 95% CI 0.3 to 1.1). Conclusions Training GPS in optimization of drug treatment of newly detected HFrEF and HFpEF did not clearly increase HF medication, but resulted in improvement in walking distance.
KW - General practice
KW - Heart failure
KW - Randomized trial
KW - Treatment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84967239920&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.04.171
DO - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.04.171
M3 - Article
C2 - 27183454
AN - SCOPUS:84967239920
SN - 0167-5273
VL - 217
SP - 174
EP - 182
JO - International Journal of Cardiology
JF - International Journal of Cardiology
ER -