Effect of thermal processing on mealworm allergenicity

Henrike Broekman*, André Knulst, Stans Den Hartog Jager, Francesca Monteleone, Marco Gaspari, Govardus De Jong, Geert Houben, Kitty Verhoeckx

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Scope: The growing world population requires the exploration of new sustainable protein sources to ensure food security. Insects such as mealworm are promising candidates. For safety reasons, a risk assessment, including allergy risks, is needed. Since allergenicity can be influenced by thermal processing, it is highly important to take this into account. Methods and results: Fresh mealworm was heat processed and extracted by a sequential extraction method using in succession Tris, urea, and a combined SDS/DTT buffer. Extracts were tested using immunoblot, basophil activation test and skin prick test in 15 shrimp allergic patients, previously indicated as population at risk for mealworm allergy. Immunoblots showed a difference in IgE binding between processed and unprocessed mealworm extracts. However, this was due to change in solubility. Some allergens were soluble in urea buffer, but became more soluble in Tris buffer and vice versa. IgE binding was seen for all extracts in blot and basophil activation test. The results from 13 skin prick tests showed a skin reaction similar between processed and unprocessed mealworm. Conclusion: Thermal processing did not lower allergenicity but clearly changed solubility of mealworm allergens. A sequential extraction method allowed for assessment of a broader protein panel.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1855-1864
Number of pages10
JournalMolecular Nutrition & Food Research
Volume59
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2015

Keywords

  • Food allergy
  • Mealworm
  • Sequential extraction method
  • Solubility thermal processing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of thermal processing on mealworm allergenicity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this