Effect of outpatient exercise training programmes in patients with chronic heart failure: a systematic review

Suzan van der Meer, Marlies Zwerink*, Marco van Brussel, Paul van der Valk, Elly Wajon, Job van der Palen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature reviewpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Advantages of outpatient exercise training are reduced waiting lists, better compliance, reduced time investment by the patient with reduced travel expenses, and less dependence on other people to participate. Therefore, this systematic review studies the effects of outpatient exercise training programmes compared with usual care on exercise capacity, exercise performance, quality of life, and safety in patients with chronic heart failure.

Design: Systematic review with meta-analysis.

Methods: Randomized controlled trials concerning patients with chronic heart failure, with a left ventricular ejection fraction

Results: Twenty-two studies were included. VO(2)max, 6-min walking test, and quality of life showed significant differences in favour of the intervention group of 1.85 ml/kg/min, 47.9 m, and 6.9 points, respectively. In none of the studies, a significant relationship was found between exercise training and adverse events.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis illustrates the efficacy and safety of outpatient training programmes for patients with chronic heart failure.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)795-803
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Volume19
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2012

Keywords

  • Exercise
  • heart failure
  • meta-analysis
  • outpatient
  • quality of life
  • training
  • QUALITY-OF-LIFE
  • RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL
  • FUNCTIONAL STATUS
  • MUSCLE FUNCTION
  • TASK-FORCE
  • CAPACITY
  • REHABILITATION
  • METAANALYSIS
  • ASSOCIATION
  • GUIDELINES

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of outpatient exercise training programmes in patients with chronic heart failure: a systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this