TY - JOUR
T1 - Early technology assessment of using whole genome sequencing in personalized oncology
AU - Simons, Martijn
AU - van de Ven, Michiel
AU - Coupé, Veerle
AU - Joore, Manuela
AU - IJzerman, Maarten
AU - Koffijberg, Erik
AU - Frederix, Geert
AU - Uyl-De Groot, Carin
AU - Cuppen, Edwin
AU - van Harten, Wim
AU - Retèl, Valesca
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) under Grant number 846001002. We like to thank Inge Eekhout for the coordination of the TANGO study
Funding Information:
MJHGS, HK, MAJ, MvdV, VMHC, EPJC have nothing to disclose. MJIJ received unrestricted research funding and consulting fees from Illumina and RTI Health Solutions. VR and WvH received unrestricted research funding from Agendia BV and Intuitive Inc.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 -
Introduction: Personalized medicine-based treatments in advanced cancer hold the promise to offer substantial health benefits to genetic subgroups, but require efficient biomarker-based patient stratification to match the right treatment and may be expensive. Standard molecular diagnostics are currently very heterogeneous, and tests are often performed sequentially. The alternative to whole genome sequencing (WGS) i.e. simultaneously testing for all relevant DNA-based biomarkers thereby allowing immediate selection of the most optimal therapy, is more costly than current techniques. In the current implementation stage, it is important to explore the added value and cost-effectiveness of using WGS on a patient level and to assess optimal introduction of WGS on the level of the healthcare system.
Areas covered: First, an overview of current worldwide initiatives concerning the use of WGS in clinical practice for cancer diagnostics is given. Second, a comprehensive, early health technology assessment (HTA) approach of evaluating WGS in the Netherlands is described, relating to the following aspects: diagnostic value, WGS-based treatment decisions, assessment of long-term health benefits and harms, early cost-effectiveness modeling, nation-wide organization, and Ethical, Legal and Societal Implications.
Expert opinion: This study provides evidence to guide further development and implementation of WGS in clinical practice and the healthcare system.
AB -
Introduction: Personalized medicine-based treatments in advanced cancer hold the promise to offer substantial health benefits to genetic subgroups, but require efficient biomarker-based patient stratification to match the right treatment and may be expensive. Standard molecular diagnostics are currently very heterogeneous, and tests are often performed sequentially. The alternative to whole genome sequencing (WGS) i.e. simultaneously testing for all relevant DNA-based biomarkers thereby allowing immediate selection of the most optimal therapy, is more costly than current techniques. In the current implementation stage, it is important to explore the added value and cost-effectiveness of using WGS on a patient level and to assess optimal introduction of WGS on the level of the healthcare system.
Areas covered: First, an overview of current worldwide initiatives concerning the use of WGS in clinical practice for cancer diagnostics is given. Second, a comprehensive, early health technology assessment (HTA) approach of evaluating WGS in the Netherlands is described, relating to the following aspects: diagnostic value, WGS-based treatment decisions, assessment of long-term health benefits and harms, early cost-effectiveness modeling, nation-wide organization, and Ethical, Legal and Societal Implications.
Expert opinion: This study provides evidence to guide further development and implementation of WGS in clinical practice and the healthcare system.
KW - Genome sequencing
KW - implementation
KW - oncology
KW - personalized medicine
KW - technology assessment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107524474&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14737167.2021.1917386
DO - 10.1080/14737167.2021.1917386
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33910430
SN - 1473-7167
VL - 21
SP - 343
EP - 351
JO - Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research
JF - Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research
IS - 3
ER -