TY - JOUR
T1 - Early outcomes of the novel Myval THV series compared to SAPIEN THV series and Evolut THV series in individuals with severe aortic stenosis
AU - van Royen, Niels
AU - Amat-Santos, Ignacio J
AU - Hudec, Martin
AU - Bunc, Matjaz
AU - Ijsselmuiden, Alexander
AU - Laanmets, Peep
AU - Unic, Daniel
AU - Merkely, Béla
AU - Hermanides, Renicus S
AU - Ninios, Vlasis
AU - Protasiewicz, Marcin
AU - Rensing, Benno J W M
AU - Martin, Pedro L
AU - Feres, Fausto
AU - Sousa, Manuel De
AU - Van Belle, Eric
AU - Linke, Axel
AU - Ielasi, Alfonso
AU - Montorfano, Matteo
AU - Webster, Mark
AU - Toutouzas, Konstantinos
AU - Teiger, Emmanuel
AU - Bedogni, Francesco
AU - Voskuil, Michiel
AU - Pan, Manuel
AU - Angerås, Oskar
AU - Kim, Won-Keun
AU - Rothe, Jürgen
AU - Kristić, Ivica
AU - Peral, Vicente
AU - Van den Branden, Ben J L
AU - Westermann, Dirk
AU - Bellini, Barbara
AU - Garcia-Gomez, Mario
AU - Tobe, Akihiro
AU - Tsai, Tsung-Ying
AU - Garg, Scot
AU - Thakkar, Ashokkumar
AU - Chandra, Udita
AU - Morice, Marie-Claude
AU - Soliman, Osama
AU - Onuma, Yoshinobu
AU - Serruys, Patrick W
AU - Baumbach, Andreas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025, The Authors.
PY - 2025/1/20
Y1 - 2025/1/20
N2 - BACKGROUND: There are limited head-to-head randomised trials comparing the performance of different transcatheter heart valves (THVs). AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the non-inferiority of the balloon-expandable Myval THV series compared to the balloon-expandable SAPIEN THV series or the self-expanding Evolut THV series. METHODS: The LANDMARK trial randomised 768 patients in a 1:1 ratio, (Myval THV series [n=384] vs contemporary series with 50% SAPIEN THV series [n=192] and 50% Evolut THV series [n=192]). The non-inferiority of Myval over the SAPIEN or Evolut THV series in terms of the 30-day primary composite safety and effectiveness endpoint as per the third Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-3) was tested in an intention-to-treat population with a predefined statistical power of 80% (1-sided alpha of 5%) for a non-inferiority margin of 10.44%. RESULTS: The Myval THV series achieved non-inferiority for the primary composite endpoint over the SAPIEN THV series (24.7% vs 24.1%, risk difference [95% confidence interval {CI}]: 0.6% [not applicable {NA} to 8.0]; p=0.0033) and the Evolut THV series (24.7% vs 30.0%, risk difference [95% CI]: –5.3% [NA to 2.5]; p<0.0001). The incidences of pacemaker implantation were comparable (Myval THV series: 15.0%, SAPIEN THV series: 17.3%, Evolut THV series: 16.8%). At 30 days, the mean pressure gradient and effective orifice area were significantly better with the Myval THV series compared to the SAPIEN THV series (p<0.0001) and better with the Evolut THV series than with the Myval THV series (p<0.0001). At 30 days, the proportion of moderate to severe prosthetic valve regurgitation was numerically higher with the Evolut THV series compared to the Myval THV series (7.4% vs 3.4%; p=0.06), while not significantly different between the Myval THV series and the SAPIEN THV series (3.4% vs 1.6%; p=0.32). CONCLUSIONS: The Myval THV series is non-inferior to the SAPIEN THV series and the Evolut THV series in terms of the primary composite endpoint at 30 days.
AB - BACKGROUND: There are limited head-to-head randomised trials comparing the performance of different transcatheter heart valves (THVs). AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the non-inferiority of the balloon-expandable Myval THV series compared to the balloon-expandable SAPIEN THV series or the self-expanding Evolut THV series. METHODS: The LANDMARK trial randomised 768 patients in a 1:1 ratio, (Myval THV series [n=384] vs contemporary series with 50% SAPIEN THV series [n=192] and 50% Evolut THV series [n=192]). The non-inferiority of Myval over the SAPIEN or Evolut THV series in terms of the 30-day primary composite safety and effectiveness endpoint as per the third Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-3) was tested in an intention-to-treat population with a predefined statistical power of 80% (1-sided alpha of 5%) for a non-inferiority margin of 10.44%. RESULTS: The Myval THV series achieved non-inferiority for the primary composite endpoint over the SAPIEN THV series (24.7% vs 24.1%, risk difference [95% confidence interval {CI}]: 0.6% [not applicable {NA} to 8.0]; p=0.0033) and the Evolut THV series (24.7% vs 30.0%, risk difference [95% CI]: –5.3% [NA to 2.5]; p<0.0001). The incidences of pacemaker implantation were comparable (Myval THV series: 15.0%, SAPIEN THV series: 17.3%, Evolut THV series: 16.8%). At 30 days, the mean pressure gradient and effective orifice area were significantly better with the Myval THV series compared to the SAPIEN THV series (p<0.0001) and better with the Evolut THV series than with the Myval THV series (p<0.0001). At 30 days, the proportion of moderate to severe prosthetic valve regurgitation was numerically higher with the Evolut THV series compared to the Myval THV series (7.4% vs 3.4%; p=0.06), while not significantly different between the Myval THV series and the SAPIEN THV series (3.4% vs 1.6%; p=0.32). CONCLUSIONS: The Myval THV series is non-inferior to the SAPIEN THV series and the Evolut THV series in terms of the primary composite endpoint at 30 days.
KW - aortic stenosis
KW - balloon-expandable valve
KW - non-inferiority
KW - randomised trial
KW - self-expanding valve
KW - transcatheter heart valve
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85215425301&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00951
DO - 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00951
M3 - Article
C2 - 39589296
SN - 1774-024X
VL - 21
SP - e105-e118
JO - EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology
JF - EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology
IS - 2
ER -