Early outcomes of the novel Myval THV series compared to SAPIEN THV series and Evolut THV series in individuals with severe aortic stenosis

Niels van Royen, Ignacio J Amat-Santos, Martin Hudec, Matjaz Bunc, Alexander Ijsselmuiden, Peep Laanmets, Daniel Unic, Béla Merkely, Renicus S Hermanides, Vlasis Ninios, Marcin Protasiewicz, Benno J W M Rensing, Pedro L Martin, Fausto Feres, Manuel De Sousa, Eric Van Belle, Axel Linke, Alfonso Ielasi, Matteo Montorfano, Mark WebsterKonstantinos Toutouzas, Emmanuel Teiger, Francesco Bedogni, Michiel Voskuil, Manuel Pan, Oskar Angerås, Won-Keun Kim, Jürgen Rothe, Ivica Kristić, Vicente Peral, Ben J L Van den Branden, Dirk Westermann, Barbara Bellini, Mario Garcia-Gomez, Akihiro Tobe, Tsung-Ying Tsai, Scot Garg, Ashokkumar Thakkar, Udita Chandra, Marie-Claude Morice, Osama Soliman, Yoshinobu Onuma, Patrick W Serruys, Andreas Baumbach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

50 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are limited head-to-head randomised trials comparing the performance of different transcatheter heart valves (THVs). AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the non-inferiority of the balloon-expandable Myval THV series compared to the balloon-expandable SAPIEN THV series or the self-expanding Evolut THV series. METHODS: The LANDMARK trial randomised 768 patients in a 1:1 ratio, (Myval THV series [n=384] vs contemporary series with 50% SAPIEN THV series [n=192] and 50% Evolut THV series [n=192]). The non-inferiority of Myval over the SAPIEN or Evolut THV series in terms of the 30-day primary composite safety and effectiveness endpoint as per the third Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-3) was tested in an intention-to-treat population with a predefined statistical power of 80% (1-sided alpha of 5%) for a non-inferiority margin of 10.44%. RESULTS: The Myval THV series achieved non-inferiority for the primary composite endpoint over the SAPIEN THV series (24.7% vs 24.1%, risk difference [95% confidence interval {CI}]: 0.6% [not applicable {NA} to 8.0]; p=0.0033) and the Evolut THV series (24.7% vs 30.0%, risk difference [95% CI]: –5.3% [NA to 2.5]; p<0.0001). The incidences of pacemaker implantation were comparable (Myval THV series: 15.0%, SAPIEN THV series: 17.3%, Evolut THV series: 16.8%). At 30 days, the mean pressure gradient and effective orifice area were significantly better with the Myval THV series compared to the SAPIEN THV series (p<0.0001) and better with the Evolut THV series than with the Myval THV series (p<0.0001). At 30 days, the proportion of moderate to severe prosthetic valve regurgitation was numerically higher with the Evolut THV series compared to the Myval THV series (7.4% vs 3.4%; p=0.06), while not significantly different between the Myval THV series and the SAPIEN THV series (3.4% vs 1.6%; p=0.32). CONCLUSIONS: The Myval THV series is non-inferior to the SAPIEN THV series and the Evolut THV series in terms of the primary composite endpoint at 30 days.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e105-e118
JournalEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology
Volume21
Issue number2
Early online date26 Nov 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Jan 2025

Keywords

  • aortic stenosis
  • balloon-expandable valve
  • non-inferiority
  • randomised trial
  • self-expanding valve
  • transcatheter heart valve

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Early outcomes of the novel Myval THV series compared to SAPIEN THV series and Evolut THV series in individuals with severe aortic stenosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this