TY - JOUR
T1 - E-coaching
T2 - New future for cardiac rehabilitation? A systematic review
AU - Veen, Eva van
AU - Bovendeert, Jeske F.M.
AU - Backx, Frank J.G.
AU - Huisstede, Bionka M.A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier B.V.
Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/12
Y1 - 2017/12
N2 - Objective: To provide an evidence-based overview of the effectiveness of e-coaching as a cardiac rehabilitation program (CRP). Methods: Pubmed, Embase, PEDro and CINAHL were searched to identify relevant RCTs. The e-coaching programs were divided into basic or complex depending on their content. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality and extracted the data. A best-evidence synthesis was used to summarize the results. Results: 19 RCTs were included. Detailed descriptions of the e-coaching programs were lacking. Complex e-coaching was more effective than usual-care for physical capacity (moderate evidence for short-, and mid-term; strong evidence for long-term), for clinical status (limited evidence for short- and mid-term; moderate evidence for the long-term), and for psychosocial health (moderate evidence for short-term; strong evidence for mid-, and long-term). For basic e-coaching only limited or no evidence for effectiveness was found. Conclusion: Promising results were found for the effectiveness of complex e-coaching as a CRP to improve a patients' physical capacity, clinical status and psychosocial health. Practice implications: The content of the e-coaching programs were not clearly described. This makes it difficult to identify which components of e-coaching are most effective and should be further developed to deliver the most optimal care for cardiac rehabilitation patients.
AB - Objective: To provide an evidence-based overview of the effectiveness of e-coaching as a cardiac rehabilitation program (CRP). Methods: Pubmed, Embase, PEDro and CINAHL were searched to identify relevant RCTs. The e-coaching programs were divided into basic or complex depending on their content. Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality and extracted the data. A best-evidence synthesis was used to summarize the results. Results: 19 RCTs were included. Detailed descriptions of the e-coaching programs were lacking. Complex e-coaching was more effective than usual-care for physical capacity (moderate evidence for short-, and mid-term; strong evidence for long-term), for clinical status (limited evidence for short- and mid-term; moderate evidence for the long-term), and for psychosocial health (moderate evidence for short-term; strong evidence for mid-, and long-term). For basic e-coaching only limited or no evidence for effectiveness was found. Conclusion: Promising results were found for the effectiveness of complex e-coaching as a CRP to improve a patients' physical capacity, clinical status and psychosocial health. Practice implications: The content of the e-coaching programs were not clearly described. This makes it difficult to identify which components of e-coaching are most effective and should be further developed to deliver the most optimal care for cardiac rehabilitation patients.
KW - Cardiac rehabilitation
KW - E-coaching
KW - Systematic review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021067000&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2017.04.017
DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2017.04.017
M3 - Review article
C2 - 28662874
AN - SCOPUS:85021067000
SN - 0738-3991
VL - 100
SP - 2218
EP - 2230
JO - Patient Education and Counseling
JF - Patient Education and Counseling
IS - 12
ER -