Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: Is less more?

Rik Rozemeijer, Wijnand P. Van Bezouwen, Michiel Voskuil, Pieter R. Stella*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using the latest-generation drug-eluting stents remains a matter of debate. Evidence suggests short regimens of DAPT are favorable for patients with a low ischemic risk, while those at a high risk of ischemia may benefit from taking DAPT for a long duration. An individually assessed risk profile is pivotal in guiding DAPT duration. Risk scores may aid individual patient DAPT decisions, but the value they add to clinical outcomes still needs to be established in a prospective randomized trial. This review aims to provide an overview on DAPT, evaluate the available evidence on DAPT duration with a description of common pitfalls of trial interpretation, and assess available tools for individual risk assessment in patients scheduled for PCI with the latest-generation DES.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)91-97
Number of pages7
JournalUS Cardiology Review
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2018

Keywords

  • Coronary artery disease
  • Drug-eluting stent
  • Dual antiplatelet therapy
  • Ischemic heart disease
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention: Is less more?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this