Duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery stenosis; a systematic review.

P.J. Nederkoorn; Y. van der Graaf; M.G.M. Hunink

Duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery stenosis; a systematic review.

Translated title of the contribution: Duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery stenosis; a systematic review.

P.J. Nederkoorn
, Y. van der Graaf
, M.G.M. Hunink

Julius Center, dept. Epidemiology & Health Economics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Translated title of the contribution	Duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery stenosis; a systematic review.
Original language	Undefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)	1324-1332
Number of pages	9
Journal	Stroke
Volume	34
Publication status	Published - 2003

Cite this

@article{bb72d33ef14948f99899a02f852e825b,

title = "Duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery stenosis; a systematic review.",

author = "P.J. Nederkoorn and \{van der Graaf\}, Y. and M.G.M. Hunink",

year = "2003",

language = "Undefined/Unknown",

volume = "34",

pages = "1324--1332",

journal = "Stroke",

issn = "0039-2499",

publisher = "Wolters Kluwer Health",

}