Double trouble: modelling the impact of low risk perception and high-risk sexual behaviour on chlamydia transmission

Daphne A. van Wees*, Chantal den Daas, Mirjam E.E. Kretzschmar, Janneke C.M. Heijne

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Risk perception plays an important role in testing behaviour for sexually transmitted infections, but is rarely included in mathematical models exploring the impact of testing. We explored the impact of incorporating sexual behaviour (SB), risk perception (RP) and differential testing uptake in SB–RP groups on prevalence, using chlamydia as an example. We developed a pair model with a susceptible–infected–susceptible structure representing heterosexuals aged 16–26 years. The effect of testing on chlamydia prevalence was compared between a model with only SB (SB model) and a model with SB and RP (SB–RP model). In the SB–RP model, a scenario without differential testing uptake in SB–RP groups was compared to scenarios with differential testing uptake in SB–RP groups. Introducing testing into the SB–RP model resulted in a slightly smaller reduction in chlamydia prevalence (238.0%) as compared to the SB model (240.4%). In the SB–RP model, the scenario without differential testing uptake in SB–RP groups overestimated the reduction in chlamydia prevalence (with 4.8%), especially in the group with high SB and low RP (19.8%). We conclude that mathematical models incorporating RP and differential testing uptake in SB–RP groups improve the impact assessment of testing and treatment on chlamydia prevalence.

Original languageEnglish
Article number20170847
JournalJournal of the Royal Society Interface
Volume15
Issue number141
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Double trouble: modelling the impact of low risk perception and high-risk sexual behaviour on chlamydia transmission'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this