TY - JOUR
T1 - Double trouble
T2 - modelling the impact of low risk perception and high-risk sexual behaviour on chlamydia transmission
AU - van Wees, Daphne A.
AU - Daas, Chantal den
AU - Kretzschmar, Mirjam E.E.
AU - Heijne, Janneke C.M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Chlamydia trachomatis, mathematical model, sexual behaviour, risk perception, testing, sexually transmitted diseases Author for correspondence: Daphne A. van Wees e-mail: [email protected] Electronic supplementary material is available online at https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4033936. Funding. This project was funded by the Strategic Programme (SPR) of the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) (project number S/113004/01/IP). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript
Publisher Copyright:
& 2018 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/1/1
Y1 - 2018/1/1
N2 - Risk perception plays an important role in testing behaviour for sexually transmitted infections, but is rarely included in mathematical models exploring the impact of testing. We explored the impact of incorporating sexual behaviour (SB), risk perception (RP) and differential testing uptake in SB–RP groups on prevalence, using chlamydia as an example. We developed a pair model with a susceptible–infected–susceptible structure representing heterosexuals aged 16–26 years. The effect of testing on chlamydia prevalence was compared between a model with only SB (SB model) and a model with SB and RP (SB–RP model). In the SB–RP model, a scenario without differential testing uptake in SB–RP groups was compared to scenarios with differential testing uptake in SB–RP groups. Introducing testing into the SB–RP model resulted in a slightly smaller reduction in chlamydia prevalence (238.0%) as compared to the SB model (240.4%). In the SB–RP model, the scenario without differential testing uptake in SB–RP groups overestimated the reduction in chlamydia prevalence (with 4.8%), especially in the group with high SB and low RP (19.8%). We conclude that mathematical models incorporating RP and differential testing uptake in SB–RP groups improve the impact assessment of testing and treatment on chlamydia prevalence.
AB - Risk perception plays an important role in testing behaviour for sexually transmitted infections, but is rarely included in mathematical models exploring the impact of testing. We explored the impact of incorporating sexual behaviour (SB), risk perception (RP) and differential testing uptake in SB–RP groups on prevalence, using chlamydia as an example. We developed a pair model with a susceptible–infected–susceptible structure representing heterosexuals aged 16–26 years. The effect of testing on chlamydia prevalence was compared between a model with only SB (SB model) and a model with SB and RP (SB–RP model). In the SB–RP model, a scenario without differential testing uptake in SB–RP groups was compared to scenarios with differential testing uptake in SB–RP groups. Introducing testing into the SB–RP model resulted in a slightly smaller reduction in chlamydia prevalence (238.0%) as compared to the SB model (240.4%). In the SB–RP model, the scenario without differential testing uptake in SB–RP groups overestimated the reduction in chlamydia prevalence (with 4.8%), especially in the group with high SB and low RP (19.8%). We conclude that mathematical models incorporating RP and differential testing uptake in SB–RP groups improve the impact assessment of testing and treatment on chlamydia prevalence.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045040715&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1098/rsif.2017.0847
DO - 10.1098/rsif.2017.0847
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85045040715
SN - 1742-5689
VL - 15
JO - Journal of the Royal Society Interface
JF - Journal of the Royal Society Interface
IS - 141
M1 - 20170847
ER -