TY - JOUR
T1 - Dolutegravir plus Two Different Prodrugs of Tenofovir to Treat HIV
AU - Venter, Willem D F
AU - Moorhouse, Michelle
AU - Sokhela, Simiso
AU - Fairlie, Lee
AU - Mashabane, Nkuli
AU - Masenya, Masebole
AU - Serenata, Celicia
AU - Akpomiemie, Godspower
AU - Qavi, Ambar
AU - Chandiwana, Nomathemba
AU - Norris, Shane
AU - Chersich, Matthew
AU - Clayden, Polly
AU - Abrams, Elaine
AU - Arulappan, Natasha
AU - Vos, Alinda
AU - McCann, Kaitlyn
AU - Simmons, Bryony
AU - Hill, Andrew
N1 - Funding Information:
Oversight was maintained through the multinational data and safety monitoring board of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), with regular reporting to an academic ethics committee, local regulatory authorities, a scientific advisory committee of senior researchers, a clinical end-point committee, an internal safety committee, and a program advisory committee formed by Unitaid and the U.S. Agency for International Development, chaired by senior members from the WHO and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria and including members from treatment activist groups, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the NIH, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Additional support was provided by contract research organizations and local experts. The trial was approved by an institutional review board (the human research ethics committee at the University of the Witwatersrand) and received local regulatory approval.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society.
PY - 2019/8/29
Y1 - 2019/8/29
N2 - BACKGROUND: Two drugs under consideration for inclusion in antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection are dolutegravir (DTG) and tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF). There are limited data on their use in low- and middle-income countries.METHODS: We conducted a 96-week, phase 3, investigator-led, open-label, randomized trial in South Africa, in which we compared a triple-therapy combination of emtricitabine (FTC) and DTG plus either of two tenofovir prodrugs - TAF (TAF-based group) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) (TDF-based group) - against the local standard-of-care regimen of TDF-FTC-efavirenz (standard-care group). Inclusion criteria included an age of 12 years or older, no receipt of ART in the previous 6 months, a creatinine clearance of more than 60 ml per minute (>80 ml per minute in patients younger than 19 years of age), and an HIV type 1 (HIV-1) RNA level of 500 copies or more per milliliter. The primary end point was the percentage of patients with a 48-week HIV-1 RNA level of less than 50 copies per milliliter (as determined with the Snapshot algorithm from the Food and Drug Administration; noninferiority margin, -10 percentage points). We report the primary (48-week) efficacy and safety data.RESULTS: A total of 1053 patients underwent randomization from February 2017 through May 2018. More than 99% of the patients were black, and 59% were female. The mean age was 32 years, and the mean CD4 count was 337 cells per cubic millimeter. At week 48, the percentage of patients with an HIV-1 RNA level of less than 50 copies per milliliter was 84% in the TAF-based group, 85% in the TDF-based group, and 79% in the standard-care group, findings that indicate that the DTG-containing regimens were noninferior to the standard-care regimen. The number of patients who discontinued the trial regimen was higher in the standard-care group than in the other two groups. In the per-protocol population, the standard-care regimen had equivalent potency to the other two regimens. The TAF-based regimen had less effect on bone density and renal function than the other regimens. Weight increase (both lean and fat mass) was greatest in the TAF-based group and among female patients (mean increase, 6.4 kg in the TAF-based group, 3.2 kg in the TDF-based group, and 1.7 kg in the standard-care group). No resistance to integrase inhibitors was identified in patients receiving the DTG-containing regimens.CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with DTG combined with either of two tenofovir prodrugs (TAF and TDF) showed noninferior efficacy to treatment with the standard-care regimen. There was significantly more weight gain with the DTG-containing regimens, especially in combination with TAF, than with the standard-care regimen. (ADVANCE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03122262.).
AB - BACKGROUND: Two drugs under consideration for inclusion in antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection are dolutegravir (DTG) and tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF). There are limited data on their use in low- and middle-income countries.METHODS: We conducted a 96-week, phase 3, investigator-led, open-label, randomized trial in South Africa, in which we compared a triple-therapy combination of emtricitabine (FTC) and DTG plus either of two tenofovir prodrugs - TAF (TAF-based group) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) (TDF-based group) - against the local standard-of-care regimen of TDF-FTC-efavirenz (standard-care group). Inclusion criteria included an age of 12 years or older, no receipt of ART in the previous 6 months, a creatinine clearance of more than 60 ml per minute (>80 ml per minute in patients younger than 19 years of age), and an HIV type 1 (HIV-1) RNA level of 500 copies or more per milliliter. The primary end point was the percentage of patients with a 48-week HIV-1 RNA level of less than 50 copies per milliliter (as determined with the Snapshot algorithm from the Food and Drug Administration; noninferiority margin, -10 percentage points). We report the primary (48-week) efficacy and safety data.RESULTS: A total of 1053 patients underwent randomization from February 2017 through May 2018. More than 99% of the patients were black, and 59% were female. The mean age was 32 years, and the mean CD4 count was 337 cells per cubic millimeter. At week 48, the percentage of patients with an HIV-1 RNA level of less than 50 copies per milliliter was 84% in the TAF-based group, 85% in the TDF-based group, and 79% in the standard-care group, findings that indicate that the DTG-containing regimens were noninferior to the standard-care regimen. The number of patients who discontinued the trial regimen was higher in the standard-care group than in the other two groups. In the per-protocol population, the standard-care regimen had equivalent potency to the other two regimens. The TAF-based regimen had less effect on bone density and renal function than the other regimens. Weight increase (both lean and fat mass) was greatest in the TAF-based group and among female patients (mean increase, 6.4 kg in the TAF-based group, 3.2 kg in the TDF-based group, and 1.7 kg in the standard-care group). No resistance to integrase inhibitors was identified in patients receiving the DTG-containing regimens.CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with DTG combined with either of two tenofovir prodrugs (TAF and TDF) showed noninferior efficacy to treatment with the standard-care regimen. There was significantly more weight gain with the DTG-containing regimens, especially in combination with TAF, than with the standard-care regimen. (ADVANCE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03122262.).
KW - Adenine/administration & dosage
KW - Adolescent
KW - Adult
KW - Anti-Retroviral Agents/administration & dosage
KW - Bone Density/drug effects
KW - CD4 Lymphocyte Count
KW - Drug Therapy, Combination
KW - Female
KW - HIV Infections/drug therapy
KW - HIV Integrase Inhibitors/administration & dosage
KW - HIV-1/genetics
KW - Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring/administration & dosage
KW - Humans
KW - Intention to Treat Analysis
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Phosphorous Acids/administration & dosage
KW - Pregnancy
KW - Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/drug therapy
KW - Prodrugs/administration & dosage
KW - RNA, Viral/blood
KW - Uracil/administration & dosage
KW - Viral Load
KW - Young Adult
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071709989&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1056/NEJMoa1902824
DO - 10.1056/NEJMoa1902824
M3 - Article
C2 - 31339677
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 381
SP - 803
EP - 815
JO - The New England journal of medicine
JF - The New England journal of medicine
IS - 9
ER -