Disease extent according to baseline [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and molecular subtype: prediction of axillary treatment response after neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer

Florien J G van Amstel*, Cornelis M de Mooij, Janine M Simons, Cristina Mitea, Paul J van Diest, Patty J Nelemans, Carmen C van der Pol, Ernest J T Luiten, Linetta B Koppert, Marjolein L Smidt, Thiemo J A van Nijnatten,

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Axillary disease extent according to baseline [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT combined with pathological axillary treatment response has been proposed to guide de-escalation of axillary treatment for clinically node-positive breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy. The aim of this study was to assess whether axillary disease extent according to baseline [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and breast cancer molecular subtype are predictors of axillary pCR. Methods: This study included clinically node-positive patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy in the prospective Radioactive Iodine Seed placement in the Axilla with Sentinel lymph node biopsy (‘RISAS’) trial (NCT02800317) with baseline [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT imaging available. The predictive value of axillary disease extent according to baseline [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and breast cancer molecular subtype to estimate axillary pCR was evaluated using logistic regression analysis. Discriminative ability is expressed using ORs with 95% confidence intervals. Results: Overall, 185 patients were included, with an axillary pCR rate of 29.7%. The axillary pCR rate for patients with limited versus advanced baseline axillary disease according to [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT was 31.9% versus 26.1% respectively. Axillary disease extent was not a significant predictor of axillary pCR (OR 0.75 (95% c.i. 0.38 to 1.46) (P = 0.404)). There were significant differences in axillary pCR rates between breast cancer molecular subtypes. The lowest probability (7%) was found for hormone receptor+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2− tumours. Using this category as a reference group, significantly increased ORs of 14.82 for hormone receptor+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2+ tumours, 40 for hormone receptor−/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2+ tumours, and 6.91 for triple-negative tumours were found (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Molecular subtype is a significant predictor of axillary pCR after neoadjuvant systemic therapy, whereas axillary disease extent according to baseline [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT is not.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberznae203
Number of pages6
JournalThe British journal of surgery
Volume111
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Aug 2024

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Axilla
  • Breast Neoplasms/pathology
  • Female
  • Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
  • Humans
  • Lymphatic Metastasis/diagnostic imaging
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoadjuvant Therapy
  • Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography/methods
  • Prospective Studies
  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
  • Treatment Outcome

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Disease extent according to baseline [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and molecular subtype: prediction of axillary treatment response after neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this